[samigo-team] Update on status of SAMigo 2.9 release

[Karen Tsao]

A regression was found from Aaon's checkin which I believe is originally
from Paul. Ying just attached her patch today. I am going to try her patch
soon.

Thanks,
Karen

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Sam Ottenhoff <ottenhoff at longsight.com>wrote:

> I'm a little unclear on SAM-1472.... there was a patch from Paul D that
> was committed but a regression was found... no one has solved the
> regression. Is the patch from Ying a complete alternative?  Or a patch to
> fix the regression caused by the original patch?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Ward, Lynn E. <leward at iupui.edu> wrote:
>
>>  SAM-1472 is a big problem for large sites with groups. Perhaps it
>> should be escalated to critical?  As Ying mentioned in the Jira, she
>> developed a fix that dowsn't involve kernel change and makes a big
>> performance improvement. Not sure what it would take to merge it, as we've
>> got a lot of customizations.
>>
>>  Yes, I'm definitely up for another test test. :-)
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 7:27 PM, "Jacqueline Mai Krueger" <jamai at stanford.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   During Tuesday's meeting, we mentioned that there were a couple of
>> code contributions that were problematic. For those interested in the
>> specific JIRA numbers, they are
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-1472
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-1438
>> These issues are not critical and are not blocking the SAMigo 2.9
>> release. If there's a need to cut a 2.9 tag soon, then we can revert to a
>> version that does not contain the contributed code. We also found out that
>> we will have help from the CLE release team so release-related concerns are
>> a non-issue.
>>
>> An action item for Stanford from Tuesday's meeting was to find out how
>> much QA work is left. Per my record, the last SAMigo test fest was
>> conducted on 11.29.11. The SAMigo code has changed since then so we would
>> need to cut a new SAMigo 2.9 tag and conduct testing against this new tag.
>>
>> *What kind of help do we need?*
>> Lots of QA!
>> Stanford will cut a 2.9 tag but need one of the 2.9 QA servers to update
>> to this latest tag (I'll send a follow-up once I know specifics)
>> *
>> *If we don't have agenda items for the next meeting 04.03, perhaps we
>> could devote time to another test fest. Would anyone be up to this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jackie
>> --
>> Jacqueline Mai Krueger
>> User Experience Specialist
>> Academic Computing Services - CourseWork
>> Stanford University
>>  <http://www.getpostbox.com>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> samigo-team mailing list
>> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> samigo-team mailing list
>> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/samigo-team/attachments/20120323/e8206e33/attachment.html