[sakai2-tcc] Tool survey example with one tool

Neal Caidin nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
Fri May 3 10:18:29 PDT 2013


I think we should go with this approach. There is always a chance for survey burnout either way, asking too many questions or having too many surveys. But it does seem to me like a second survey would essentially be the same survey, but with a different set of tools (contrib). I think that will strike folks as odd (amazing how much conjecture we need to do to guess how folks will react to these things. We should get some feedback on surveys at the conference!).

And I'm okay with simplifying the question to have one answer per tool, but I don't think we've figured out what that should look like. We've had three suggestions. 

-- Neal


On May 3, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay at indiana.edu> wrote:

> I want to circle back to keeping the tools only for core.     I think that's a mistake.  I think  we should attempt to get it all now.   It's annoying to get survey after survey - people will start hitting delete once they see  yet another survey.    
> 
> Make it 3 pages.   Page 1 Core, Page 2 Contrib, Page 3 - find out what people are using LTI for.   They will fill out what they want. 
> 
> Megan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Seth Theriault
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 8:42 AM
> To: Neal Caidin
> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org Committee
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Tool survey example with one tool
> 
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
>> FYI - This scale is quantifiable.
> 
> OK, "quantifiable" was the wrong word here. I would still prefer something simple so that when people have to fill this out, they don't have to think about how much they agree with the statement that "tool is being used extensively" or how happy their users are with it. In addition, people are either willing to work on it or not; lukewarm answers to that question provide little value, IMHO.
> 
> Seth
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc



More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list