[sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

[Steve Swinsburg]

I gave a summary of what has happened in the two meetings (one was today, one a fortnight ago) and various emails within the group. It's only just getting off the ground so please be patient while more is worked out. 

There is no need to speculate about what an incubation process might entail. Read the Jasig Incubation pages and the CLE tool scorecard, add some room for projects with less of a code focus and you would be pretty close I imagine.

Also, speculation != defensiveness. Whenever I mention a review of existing tools as part of an incubation process, that's when people get defensive. IMO its imperative that that be done.

cheers,
Steve


On 07/03/2013, at 11:42 PM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Steve Swinsburg
> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> There will be no surprises. People seem to be rather defensive about incubation for existing projects
>> and I'm not sure why, it can only make things better.
> 
> People are "defensive" because the new Apereo incubation process has
> been talked about in the abstract for months, and no actual
> announcements, plans, or progress reports have been made by the
> working group, the Board, or anyone else.
> 
> Everything about the process and what it COULD encompass is therefore
> speculation, but that's all we have to go on.
> 
> Seth