[sakai2-tcc] Apereo presentation on 2.9 - feedback requested

[May, Megan Marie]

This might be a good time to talk about what CLE sessions the TCC hopes to have at the conference, do any coordination, and get ideas going so there isn't the mad scramble :)

Will there be bootcamps? (I think I recall AZ/unicon coordinated that last year)
Do we want a TCC session?  What will we focus on?
CLE Team updates?

Megan

From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Charles Severance
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:35 PM
To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 2
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Apereo presentation on 2.9 - feedback requested

I would keep it generic in the proposal and description - but by the time you give the talk - we may have more substantive things to say.   We get to initial alignment in the meeting before the conference starts and do more thinking about resources and schedule in the post-conference meeting.

So at your EU talk - it needed to stay vague - but by the June conference you won't be dacning quite so much :)

It is not like we are keeping secrets - we just don't' know yet.   We need to see how things unfold between now and June and being together with beer also helps to get clarity on the collective position / plans.

Make sense?

/Chuck

On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Neal Caidin wrote:


Hi All,

In my proposal for Sakai 2.9 CLE presentation for the Apereo Conference, I put in the clause "Come learn about all the improvements and an outline of forecasted plans for the future."

For the EuroSakai conference I managed to keep it high level, and the interest in 2.9 and CLE wants you presentation, seemed to be high enough to deflect scrutiny. I did get a couple of comments though, that institutions would like a clearer roadmap and timeline into the future. While I recognize the constraints of providing such a roadmap and timeline, if we can develop something substantive and a good way of answering those concerns, we might win some additional confidence and allies in our process.

What is the best way to proceed on this? Or should I just keep it generic? (My preference is for the former :-) ).

Regards,

Neal Caidin

Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org<mailto:nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org>
Skype: nealkdin
AIM: ncaidin at aol.com<mailto:ncaidin at aol.com>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130225/64851b85/attachment.html