[sakai2-tcc] Apereo presentation on 2.9 - feedback requested
Charles Severance
csev at umich.edu
Mon Feb 25 12:35:19 PST 2013
I would keep it generic in the proposal and description - but by the time you give the talk - we may have more substantive things to say. We get to initial alignment in the meeting before the conference starts and do more thinking about resources and schedule in the post-conference meeting.
So at your EU talk - it needed to stay vague - but by the June conference you won't be dacning quite so much :)
It is not like we are keeping secrets - we just don't' know yet. We need to see how things unfold between now and June and being together with beer also helps to get clarity on the collective position / plans.
Make sense?
/Chuck
On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Neal Caidin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In my proposal for Sakai 2.9 CLE presentation for the Apereo Conference, I put in the clause "Come learn about all the improvements and an outline of forecasted plans for the future."
>
> For the EuroSakai conference I managed to keep it high level, and the interest in 2.9 and CLE wants you presentation, seemed to be high enough to deflect scrutiny. I did get a couple of comments though, that institutions would like a clearer roadmap and timeline into the future. While I recognize the constraints of providing such a roadmap and timeline, if we can develop something substantive and a good way of answering those concerns, we might win some additional confidence and allies in our process.
>
> What is the best way to proceed on this? Or should I just keep it generic? (My preference is for the former :-) ).
>
> Regards,
>
> Neal Caidin
>
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> AIM: ncaidin at aol.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130225/456abbc7/attachment.html
More information about the sakai2-tcc
mailing list