[sakai2-tcc] 292triage label ?

[Neal Caidin]

Hi All,

At least for my purposes, I found it useful to use the 291triage label for the CLE 2.9.1 release. Part of the reason for this is that different indies have different versions. CLE, Kernel and Samigo are fairly straightforward, but then we also have Basic LTI, Lessons, Polls, Search, MSGCNTR, Profile2, etc which are not picked up by searching on the 1.3.x or 2.9.x merge flags.  Having a label means I can guarantee my filter picks up things I want, for communication to QA and others, that a more complex query might miss.

Any concerns with me continuing to use labels? I think in general, if folks don't tag SAK, KNL, and Samigo issues with the labels, I can use our "standard" filters to bulk apply the label(s) so as not to miss anything. So I don't think there is much of a downside.

The reason I ask, versus just doing, is because I want to put out a call to the prod, dev and qa lists for people to start tagging issues for 2.9.2 , and if there are major objections to this, I want to know before making that call.

Thanks,
Neal