[sakai2-tcc] [cle-release-team] 292triage label ?

[May, Megan Marie]

Wouldn't this be complicating a semi-complicated work flow?      And creating data redundancy?   

Megan


-----Original Message-----
From: cle-release-team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:cle-release-team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Neal Caidin
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:53 PM
To: cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 2
Subject: [cle-release-team] 292triage label ?

Hi All,

At least for my purposes, I found it useful to use the 291triage label for the CLE 2.9.1 release. Part of the reason for this is that different indies have different versions. CLE, Kernel and Samigo are fairly straightforward, but then we also have Basic LTI, Lessons, Polls, Search, MSGCNTR, Profile2, etc which are not picked up by searching on the 1.3.x or 2.9.x merge flags.  Having a label means I can guarantee my filter picks up things I want, for communication to QA and others, that a more complex query might miss.

Any concerns with me continuing to use labels? I think in general, if folks don't tag SAK, KNL, and Samigo issues with the labels, I can use our "standard" filters to bulk apply the label(s) so as not to miss anything. So I don't think there is much of a downside.

The reason I ask, versus just doing, is because I want to put out a call to the prod, dev and qa lists for people to start tagging issues for 2.9.2 , and if there are major objections to this, I want to know before making that call.

Thanks,
Neal

_______________________________________________
cle-release-team mailing list
cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team