[sakai2-tcc] Letter to the OAE steering committee?

[Nate Angell]

Versions of the distribution of Sakai CLE called "rSmart Sakai CLE"
are not numbered differently from community releases, upon which they
are based.

= nate

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Noah Botimer <botimer at umich.edu> wrote:
> I might be tempted to ask "What Sakai CLE version is the basis of your
> production system?" with options like "A 2.6 release, The 2.6 maintenance
> branch, a 2.7 release, ...". A quick sentence above could clarify release vs
> branch easily. This would eliminate 5 options and preserve the distinction.
> Can someone verify whether rSmart CLE is differently numbered?
>
> Thanks,
> -Noah
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Sam Ottenhoff <ottenhoff at longsight.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> * What version of Sakai CLE do you currently run in production?  2.6.0,
>> 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.x would all be one option not multiple options
>>
>>
>> Why would these be one option? They are different releases as much as the
>> rest of the 2.x series are. It's also interesting to see if people are on an
>> old version of a release (ie using 2.6.0 instead of 2.6.2). That info could
>> also be later used as an opportunity to indicate with those people the
>> reason why they should upgrade.
>>
>
>
> It was a suggestion for simplicity.... 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.x, 2.7.0,
> 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.x, 2.8.0, 2.8.1, 2.8.x....  makes for a lot of choices.
>  But yes, I too am interested in knowing how many people are on the latest
> version of a branch and how many people run releases versus maintenance
> branches.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>