[sakai2-tcc] Agenda - Re: Invitations sent for TCC - CLECC meeting this week

[Berg, Alan]

Yes, I concur with Seth's sentiment, I don't think you are thinking too far ahead. It would be nice to see little distance between the parties view points. In the past we had problems with talk shops and the inability to define short term goals. If we go the wow-scorecard-two route then it would have to be light weight and with immediate actionable priorities. I don't want another couple of years in the desert for Sakai CLE.

Regards,
           Alan


Alan Berg

Innovation working group
On the use of ICT in Education & Research
University of Amsterdam

________________________________________
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Seth Theriault [slt at columbia.edu]
Sent: 12 December 2012 04:13
To: Steve Swinsburg
Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 2
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Agenda - Re: Invitations sent for TCC - CLECC meeting this week

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Steve Swinsburg
<steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:

> In any case, yes, there will be an incubation process, how it relates to the
> CLE and other existing projects is being discussed. My initial thoughts are
> for a review of all modules of CLE for code debt, areas for enhancements and
> maintenance/support, rather than just grandfathering it all in.

Who exactly is discussing this? The existing Jasig Incubation group? A
new incarnation of the Jasig Incubation group? The Apereo Board
certainly seems to be?

I would like to think that the people discussing this are planning to
engage the various project-specific "steering groups" --- using this
term loosely -- for input. But perhaps I am thinking too far ahead.

Seth
_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc