[sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end period) clarification

[DAVID ROLDAN MARTINEZ]

Thanks!!!!!
________________________________________
De: Beth Kirschner [bkirschn at umich.edu]
Enviado el: jueves, 26 de mayo de 2011 21:52
Para: May, Megan Marie
CC: Jean-Francois Leveque; Matthew Jones; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org; DAVID ROLDAN MARTINEZ
Asunto: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end   period) clarification

I've updated the documentation, trying to take everyone's comments into consideration. Please take a look at https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Maintenance+Branch+Merge+Policy

- Beth

On May 23, 2011, at 10:03 AM, May, Megan Marie wrote:

> This sounds good to me.
>
> There hasn't been any objections to the refinements or alternate suggestions.  The spirit of the practice isn't changing so I don't believe that we need a formal vote on this.
>
> Would you update the confluence documentation?
> Megan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beth Kirschner [mailto:bkirschn at umich.edu]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:51 PM
> To: Jean-Francois Leveque
> Cc: May, Megan Marie; Matthew Jones; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org; DAVID ROLDAN MARTINEZ
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end period) clarification
>
> +1
>
> On May 20, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>
>> Megan,
>>
>> I'm not Beth and my own vision was a bit blurred. ;)
>>
>> I think the following order is worth trying:
>> 1) Criteria outline in JIRA
>> 2) 1st announcement to dev and production with cc to TCC
>> 3) 2nd announcement to dev and production with cc to TCC if all goes
>> fine
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> J-F
>>
>> On 20/05/2011 17:01, May, Megan Marie wrote:
>>> Beth,
>>>  What was your vision?
>>>
>>> Megan
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jean-Francois Leveque [mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr]
>>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:42 AM
>>> To: May, Megan Marie
>>> Cc: Matthew Jones; Beth Kirschner;
>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org; DAVID ROLDAN MARTINEZ
>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end
>>> period) clarification
>>>
>>> I thought the criteria outline was prepared and went to the TCC oversight before any announcement on other lists.
>>>
>>> I think the process has to be more explicit regarding the order.
>>>
>>> Do you mean CCing sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org when sending to other lists will do as far as oversight is concerned?
>>>
>>> +1 on JIRA criteria outline. If everyone is OK, this should be in the
>>> policy page.
>>>
>>> J-F
>>>
>>> On 19/05/2011 21:16, May, Megan Marie wrote:
>>>> It was my understanding that the announcement needed to be made to
>>>> the community at large for comment. I think that it only went to the
>>>> TCC list (which there are not a large number of lurkers).
>>>>
>>>> My thoughts on how this should work are
>>>>
>>>> *The JIRA should outline how the criteria is met
>>>>
>>>> *The announcement should be sent to the community at large (which
>>>> would also outline the above). I never thought about the wait time
>>>> but I think
>>>> 1 week sounds fair
>>>>
>>>> Right now my impression is that the TCC oversight is that we all are
>>>> monitoring to ensure the above is happening and step in if things
>>>> seemed to go awry during the trial period.
>>>>
>>>> ~Me
>>>>
>>>> *From:*sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] *On Behalf Of
>>>> *Matthew Jones
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:09 PM
>>>> *To:* Beth Kirschner
>>>> *Cc:* sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> *Subject:* [sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end period)
>>>> clarification
>>>>
>>>> Hi Beth (and others),
>>>>
>>>> A question came up about (enhancement) Branch Policy policy today
>>>> [1] on the RM call and I don't remember if there was ever an answer
>>>> to it. It's was regarding when the period for discussion is over and
>>>> merging can be done. Since you drafted the proposal maybe you
>>>> remember if there was an answer?
>>>>
>>>> * Yesterday JFL floated the request to merge SAK-14625 to 2.7.x.
>>>> (Add group section filter to dropbox) [2] Currently this has been
>>>> met with silence which is okay based on the policy. But there's
>>>> nothing that states how much time should pass before action can be
>>>> taken to actually merge this. No formal vote or discussion is required based on the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> But when should it get actually merged if there are no objections? 1
>>>> week? By the next release management call? When TCC chair says
>>>> "Since there were no objections to the request to merge SAK-14625 it
>>>> shall be merged!" I don't really have a great opinion on this.
>>>> Minimum 1 week from email then made official (in or out) at the next
>>>> RM call seems like the best option to me? Many of us on the RM call are also on TCC.
>>>>
>>>> I plan to write up one for annotated URL (SAK-19369) for the next
>>>> 2.7 release as well. I think these 2 were the first so far? There
>>>> might be a few more as we look to getting a 2.7.2 release out.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Maintenance+Branch+M
>>>> erge+Policy
>>>> <https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Maintenance+Branch+
>>>> Merge+Policy>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/2011-May/001108.
>>>> html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-François Lévêque
>> Responsable technique Sakai
>> Université Pierre et Marie Curie
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Francois Leveque
>> Australe CTO (local Sakai CLE)
>> University Pierre and Marie Curie
>> France
>>
>>
>
>
>