[sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance

[Beth Kirschner]

Good point -- I was just trying to keep things simpler. It would be  
nice if we could do a boolean-and on JIRA components. I just googled  
around and found a JIRA issue (http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ 
JRA-1560) which seems to imply we could do this in the 4.x release.  
There's a new "advanced search" that seems to support this. Woo-hoo!

- Beth

On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:

> Specific to the negative part of you answer to my suggestion, Beth.  
> How do you currently query with a JIRA filter the list of i18n  
> issues in a specific component of Sakai? This is the thing I want to  
> solve with this. If you've got a better solution, please tell me.
>
> - J-F
>
> Beth Kirschner a écrit :
>> I would agree with Megan's desire for a overall review of JIRA  
>> workflow than piecemeal additions (which have come and gone in the  
>> past). One thing I've always wanted to see in JIRA is a _real_  
>> priority field (as opposed to the current priority which is really  
>> severity).
>> Specific to Jean-Francois' suggestions, though, I like the checkbox  
>> for translations, but think that the internationalization component  
>> serves better to determine if the issue describes an I18N bug fix.
>> - Beth
>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>>> My 2 cents follow
>>>
>>> I think i18n/L10n in JIRA is a big chunk and most other members of  
>>> the
>>> TCC may not have experience with it, but I'm doing my best to  
>>> explain.
>>>
>>> I think maybe Kernel, MT and RM, like i18n/L10n, have their own
>>> management which lead to check box creations such as.
>>>
>>> RM:
>>> Conversion Script Required
>>> Property addition/change required
>>>
>>> MT:
>>> Maintenance Team Issue
>>>
>>> As far as those niches and others are not concerned, I'm pro- 
>>> holistic.
>>>
>>> Do we have a document for proposed changes with work flow and  
>>> management
>>> explained?
>>>
>>> Do we have a list of anti-patterns?
>>>
>>> Do we have a road map for this big increment?
>>>
>>> I thought the test instance was for testing and therefore  
>>> demonstrating
>>> changes. Maybe my English skills are not up to the task at times.
>>>
>>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>>> Let me start off by saying that I don't think it's a bad idea.
>>>>
>>>> My 2 cents - JIRA needs an overhaul when it comes to dealing with  
>>>> workflow and management for Sakai2.    I'd rather see it reviewed  
>>>> in a holistic manner and implement changes (documented changes)  
>>>> at once rather than add them piecemeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jean-Francois Leveque [mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:12 AM
>>>> To: May, Megan Marie
>>>> Cc: Anthony Whyte; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>>
>>>> i18n and L10n
>>>>
>>>> They need to be distinguished because it will help us deal with
>>>> questions such as:
>>>> - Are there translations updates in the latest release (L10n)?
>>>> - Are there i18n fixes in the latest release?
>>>> without having to check each i18n component issue with latest  
>>>> issue in
>>>> Fix Version/s.
>>>>
>>>> Having i18n as component makes live filters unusable when you're  
>>>> trying
>>>> to find i18n issues related to a real component. We can keep the  
>>>> i18n
>>>> component for the i18n utility classes and related configuration.
>>>>
>>>> Would like to be able to demonstrate this to Beth and other active
>>>> members of the i18n community like David Roldan and Shoji.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>>>> What are the checkboxes for?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>>>>> ] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:58 AM
>>>>> To: Anthony Whyte
>>>>> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I get 2 new checkboxes?
>>>>>
>>>>> Who should I ask?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> J-F
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony Whyte a écrit :
>>>>>> Have a look at our new Jira 4.1.2 test instance.  Log in and  
>>>>>> kick the tires at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://72.249.101.17:8080/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When we upgrade I'd like to add SSL keys to both our Jira and  
>>>>>> Confluence instances.  Any objections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anth
>
>