[sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

Specific to the negative part of you answer to my suggestion, Beth. How 
do you currently query with a JIRA filter the list of i18n issues in a 
specific component of Sakai? This is the thing I want to solve with 
this. If you've got a better solution, please tell me.

- J-F

Beth Kirschner a écrit :
> I would agree with Megan's desire for a overall review of JIRA workflow 
> than piecemeal additions (which have come and gone in the past). One 
> thing I've always wanted to see in JIRA is a _real_ priority field (as 
> opposed to the current priority which is really severity).
> 
> Specific to Jean-Francois' suggestions, though, I like the checkbox for 
> translations, but think that the internationalization component serves 
> better to determine if the issue describes an I18N bug fix.
> 
> - Beth
> 
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
> 
>> My 2 cents follow
>>
>> I think i18n/L10n in JIRA is a big chunk and most other members of the
>> TCC may not have experience with it, but I'm doing my best to explain.
>>
>> I think maybe Kernel, MT and RM, like i18n/L10n, have their own
>> management which lead to check box creations such as.
>>
>> RM:
>> Conversion Script Required
>> Property addition/change required
>>
>> MT:
>> Maintenance Team Issue
>>
>> As far as those niches and others are not concerned, I'm pro-holistic.
>>
>> Do we have a document for proposed changes with work flow and management
>> explained?
>>
>> Do we have a list of anti-patterns?
>>
>> Do we have a road map for this big increment?
>>
>> I thought the test instance was for testing and therefore demonstrating
>> changes. Maybe my English skills are not up to the task at times.
>>
>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>> Let me start off by saying that I don't think it's a bad idea.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents - JIRA needs an overhaul when it comes to dealing with 
>>> workflow and management for Sakai2.    I'd rather see it reviewed in 
>>> a holistic manner and implement changes (documented changes) at once 
>>> rather than add them piecemeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jean-Francois Leveque [mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:12 AM
>>> To: May, Megan Marie
>>> Cc: Anthony Whyte; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>
>>> i18n and L10n
>>>
>>> They need to be distinguished because it will help us deal with
>>> questions such as:
>>> - Are there translations updates in the latest release (L10n)?
>>> - Are there i18n fixes in the latest release?
>>> without having to check each i18n component issue with latest issue in
>>> Fix Version/s.
>>>
>>> Having i18n as component makes live filters unusable when you're trying
>>> to find i18n issues related to a real component. We can keep the i18n
>>> component for the i18n utility classes and related configuration.
>>>
>>> Would like to be able to demonstrate this to Beth and other active
>>> members of the i18n community like David Roldan and Shoji.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>>> What are the checkboxes for?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>>>> [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of 
>>>> Jean-Francois Leveque
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:58 AM
>>>> To: Anthony Whyte
>>>> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>>
>>>> Could I get 2 new checkboxes?
>>>>
>>>> Who should I ask?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> J-F
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Whyte a écrit :
>>>>> Have a look at our new Jira 4.1.2 test instance.  Log in and kick 
>>>>> the tires at
>>>>>
>>>>> http://72.249.101.17:8080/
>>>>>
>>>>> When we upgrade I'd like to add SSL keys to both our Jira and 
>>>>> Confluence instances.  Any objections.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Anth