[sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

I'd like to know which one performs better when doing requests in JIRA, 
checkbox+component or component+component (with query syntax).

- J-F

Beth Kirschner a écrit :
> Good point -- I was just trying to keep things simpler. It would be nice 
> if we could do a boolean-and on JIRA components. I just googled around 
> and found a JIRA issue (http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-1560) which 
> seems to imply we could do this in the 4.x release. There's a new 
> "advanced search" that seems to support this. Woo-hoo!
> 
> - Beth
> 
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
> 
>> Specific to the negative part of you answer to my suggestion, Beth. 
>> How do you currently query with a JIRA filter the list of i18n issues 
>> in a specific component of Sakai? This is the thing I want to solve 
>> with this. If you've got a better solution, please tell me.
>>
>> - J-F
>>
>> Beth Kirschner a écrit :
>>> I would agree with Megan's desire for a overall review of JIRA 
>>> workflow than piecemeal additions (which have come and gone in the 
>>> past). One thing I've always wanted to see in JIRA is a _real_ 
>>> priority field (as opposed to the current priority which is really 
>>> severity).
>>> Specific to Jean-Francois' suggestions, though, I like the checkbox 
>>> for translations, but think that the internationalization component 
>>> serves better to determine if the issue describes an I18N bug fix.
>>> - Beth
>>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>>>> My 2 cents follow
>>>>
>>>> I think i18n/L10n in JIRA is a big chunk and most other members of the
>>>> TCC may not have experience with it, but I'm doing my best to explain.
>>>>
>>>> I think maybe Kernel, MT and RM, like i18n/L10n, have their own
>>>> management which lead to check box creations such as.
>>>>
>>>> RM:
>>>> Conversion Script Required
>>>> Property addition/change required
>>>>
>>>> MT:
>>>> Maintenance Team Issue
>>>>
>>>> As far as those niches and others are not concerned, I'm pro-holistic.
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a document for proposed changes with work flow and 
>>>> management
>>>> explained?
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a list of anti-patterns?
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a road map for this big increment?
>>>>
>>>> I thought the test instance was for testing and therefore demonstrating
>>>> changes. Maybe my English skills are not up to the task at times.
>>>>
>>>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>>>> Let me start off by saying that I don't think it's a bad idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> My 2 cents - JIRA needs an overhaul when it comes to dealing with 
>>>>> workflow and management for Sakai2.    I'd rather see it reviewed 
>>>>> in a holistic manner and implement changes (documented changes) at 
>>>>> once rather than add them piecemeal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jean-Francois Leveque [mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:12 AM
>>>>> To: May, Megan Marie
>>>>> Cc: Anthony Whyte; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>>>
>>>>> i18n and L10n
>>>>>
>>>>> They need to be distinguished because it will help us deal with
>>>>> questions such as:
>>>>> - Are there translations updates in the latest release (L10n)?
>>>>> - Are there i18n fixes in the latest release?
>>>>> without having to check each i18n component issue with latest issue in
>>>>> Fix Version/s.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having i18n as component makes live filters unusable when you're 
>>>>> trying
>>>>> to find i18n issues related to a real component. We can keep the i18n
>>>>> component for the i18n utility classes and related configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would like to be able to demonstrate this to Beth and other active
>>>>> members of the i18n community like David Roldan and Shoji.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>>>>> What are the checkboxes for?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>>>>>> [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of 
>>>>>> Jean-Francois Leveque
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:58 AM
>>>>>> To: Anthony Whyte
>>>>>> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could I get 2 new checkboxes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who should I ask?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J-F
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony Whyte a écrit :
>>>>>>> Have a look at our new Jira 4.1.2 test instance.  Log in and kick 
>>>>>>> the tires at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://72.249.101.17:8080/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When we upgrade I'd like to add SSL keys to both our Jira and 
>>>>>>> Confluence instances.  Any objections.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anth