[sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance

[Beth Kirschner]

I would agree with Megan's desire for a overall review of JIRA  
workflow than piecemeal additions (which have come and gone in the  
past). One thing I've always wanted to see in JIRA is a _real_  
priority field (as opposed to the current priority which is really  
severity).

Specific to Jean-Francois' suggestions, though, I like the checkbox  
for translations, but think that the internationalization component  
serves better to determine if the issue describes an I18N bug fix.

- Beth

On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:

> My 2 cents follow
>
> I think i18n/L10n in JIRA is a big chunk and most other members of the
> TCC may not have experience with it, but I'm doing my best to explain.
>
> I think maybe Kernel, MT and RM, like i18n/L10n, have their own
> management which lead to check box creations such as.
>
> RM:
> Conversion Script Required
> Property addition/change required
>
> MT:
> Maintenance Team Issue
>
> As far as those niches and others are not concerned, I'm pro-holistic.
>
> Do we have a document for proposed changes with work flow and  
> management
> explained?
>
> Do we have a list of anti-patterns?
>
> Do we have a road map for this big increment?
>
> I thought the test instance was for testing and therefore  
> demonstrating
> changes. Maybe my English skills are not up to the task at times.
>
> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>> Let me start off by saying that I don't think it's a bad idea.
>>
>> My 2 cents - JIRA needs an overhaul when it comes to dealing with  
>> workflow and management for Sakai2.    I'd rather see it reviewed  
>> in a holistic manner and implement changes (documented changes) at  
>> once rather than add them piecemeal.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jean-Francois Leveque [mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:12 AM
>> To: May, Megan Marie
>> Cc: Anthony Whyte; sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>
>> i18n and L10n
>>
>> They need to be distinguished because it will help us deal with
>> questions such as:
>> - Are there translations updates in the latest release (L10n)?
>> - Are there i18n fixes in the latest release?
>> without having to check each i18n component issue with latest issue  
>> in
>> Fix Version/s.
>>
>> Having i18n as component makes live filters unusable when you're  
>> trying
>> to find i18n issues related to a real component. We can keep the i18n
>> component for the i18n utility classes and related configuration.
>>
>> Would like to be able to demonstrate this to Beth and other active
>> members of the i18n community like David Roldan and Shoji.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>> What are the checkboxes for?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>>> ] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:58 AM
>>> To: Anthony Whyte
>>> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Sakai Jira 4.1.2: test instance
>>>
>>> Could I get 2 new checkboxes?
>>>
>>> Who should I ask?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> J-F
>>>
>>> Anthony Whyte a écrit :
>>>> Have a look at our new Jira 4.1.2 test instance.  Log in and kick  
>>>> the tires at
>>>>
>>>> http://72.249.101.17:8080/
>>>>
>>>> When we upgrade I'd like to add SSL keys to both our Jira and  
>>>> Confluence instances.  Any objections.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Anth
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>