[WG: Sakai QA] why a separate step to join sites?
David Haines
dlhaines at umich.edu
Fri Jul 24 07:32:56 PDT 2009
Currently if you try to access a site that you can join but have not
yet joined you'll get a "site unavailable" message. Among other
things this makes inviting people to a site awkward. If you create a
site and email a URL to people who can have access they'll need to
manually join before they get access. At Michigan we're running a
modified version of code that Ian Boston created that will
automatically join people to sites they are eligible to join but this
requires distributing a special URL.
But if you are trying to access a site that you have permission to
join what is the use of having an explicit join step? I do see the
use of a tool that lists separately sites you have joined and sites
you can join. I see the value of being able to unjoin sites you no
longer need to a member of. I just don't see the use of requiring
someone to explicitly join a site.
Is there some reason that the default behavior of Sakai (2.x) should
not be changed to automatically join people to sites they are trying
to visit as long as they are eligible to join the site?
This question comes from looking at http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-15832
.
Any comments are welcome.
- Dave
David Haines
CTools Developer
Digital Media Commons
University of Michigan
dlhaines at umich.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-qa/attachments/20090724/dedbe08d/attachment.html
More information about the sakai-qa
mailing list