[sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site
Jean-Francois Leveque
jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr
Thu Jun 12 01:13:25 PDT 2014
Still hard for me not being able to attend the meeting this year. :(
Le 11/06/2014 22:47, Steve Swinsburg a écrit :
> They may appear to be major roadblocks but it may not end up being too
> difficult. The 'beer' proposal is already in public beta, has less than
> 1 question per day, 61 avid users and 156 visits per day
>
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/48905/beer
> http://beer.stackexchange.com/
>
> I've received positive feedback from the uPortal SG, they are going to
> add it as a discussion item.
>
> We did agree to try this out at the PMC meeting, lets see where it goes.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:05 AM, <markjnorton at earthlink.net
> <mailto:markjnorton at earthlink.net>> wrote:
>
> > I do like the openness and socialness (is that a word?)
>
> "Social Nature" might be a better way to put it. :)
>
> Generally, I agree, but SE has put up some major roadblocks to
> creating a community. Clearly, they are looking for projects the
> size of OpenStack, rather than Sakai.
> Perhaps we can ask Neal to look into getting the Atlassian Question
> plugin and give it a go. From the adverts on the Atlassian site, it
> seems very similar (ie, knock off) of SE, including reputation.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Swinsburg __
> Sent: Jun 11, 2014 9:21 AM
> To: "Mark J. Norton" __
> Cc: Matthew Jones __, Aaron Zeckoski __,
> "sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>" __
> Subject: Re: [sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site
>
> I've approached the steering committees of the other major
> Apereo projects (uPortal, CAS and Bedework) to see if they are
> interested in an Apereo wide SE site - may be a few weeks before
> I hear back as they will need to discuss. Its worth trying
> everything though, give the plugin a go and lets see what it
> looks like.
>
> I do like the openness and socialness (is that a word?) of the
> Stack Exchange sites though. I think we can get some good
> exposure that way rather than with confluence.
>
> cheers,
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:48 PM, <markjnorton at earthlink.net
> <mailto:markjnorton at earthlink.net>> wrote:
>
> I didn't see any further discussion on this topic. Neal and
> I proposed the Confluence plugin approach in Miami. Should
> we give that a try?
>
>
> - Mark Norton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Jones __
> Sent: Jun 7, 2014 8:27 PM
> To: Aaron Zeckoski __
> Cc: "sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>" __
> Subject: Re: [sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site
>
> Yeah, looking at the entire workflow, I think the bigger
> problem is the commitment phase. To actually get a site
> through to commitment phase you have to have the
> "minimum" of three scores
>
> - 200 total confirmed committers (up from the 60)
> - 100 of of the committers have to have 200+ rep on
> Stack Overflow
> - Some formula related to commitment score
> (http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/53650/area-51-commit-percent/53733#53733)
>
> Look at a topic like "Latin Language" that is only 50%
> through commitment with 100 committed
> (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/48247/latin-language)
>
> Not to be pessimistic but I can't realistically see a
> Sakai only space getting that much activity. I think our
> only options are
> - The confluence plugin mentioned at the PMC meeting,
> - Suggesting people to post questions to regular Stack
> OverFlow with Sakai Tag and periodically watching the
> Sakai tag
> (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/sakai).
> Participating with voting and answering is good for rep.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Aaron Zeckoski
> <azeckoski at unicon.net <mailto:azeckoski at unicon.net>> wrote:
>
> We have 10 example questions so we need another 30
> questions and about
> 380 more votes (at a minimum). I still think the
> plan should be to get
> the 40 questions (or maybe 45) in there first and
> then we will use the
> dev list to get the votes in there.
> -AZ
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg
> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com
> <mailto:steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Yep I've used up my questions and votes too.
> Everyone else if you can pose
> > some questions and vote up the others that would
> be good.
> >
> > sent from my mobile device
> >
> > On 07/06/2014 8:10 AM, "Aaron Zeckoski"
> <azeckoski at unicon.net <mailto:azeckoski at unicon.net>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Makes sense. Still worth the discussion but I'm
> dropping the suggestion.
> >> I maxed out my questions so we just need a few
> others to do the same.
> >>
> >> On Jun 6, 2014 5:15 PM, "Steve Swinsburg"
> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com
> <mailto:steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yeah I think we need to keep the projects
> separate. The other projects
> >>> may not want to use this anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Also these are meant to be 40 example questions
> which then get voted on
> >>> to show we have a community. They don't need to
> be answered afaict. I am
> >>> unsure if they get transferred to the new
> community site.
> >>>
> >>> JFL we talked about this as an experiment to
> capture the technical
> >>> questions that come up on the dev list since
> the good info can be hard to
> >>> find unless you remember the thread
> date/subject etc.
> >>>
> >>> If anyone down votes I propose they lose commit
> rights ;)
> >>>
> >>> Back in AU now.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers all.
> >>> Steve
> >>>
> >>> sent from my mobile device
> >>>
> >>> On 07/06/2014 6:28 AM, "Charles Severance"
> <csev at umich.edu <mailto:csev at umich.edu>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque
> >>>> <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr
> <mailto:jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Could someone tell me why you want to create
> such a space wether i's for
> >>>> Sakai or Apereo?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that Sakai and CAS should be separate
> and there probably should
> >>>> not be an Apereo S.O. There might be an
> ApereoOAE stackoverflow.
> >>>>
> >>>> The foundation is a structure for intellectual
> property and shared
> >>>> services - it is not the uber brand above each
> project.
> >>>>
> >>>> /Chuck
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> sakai-pmc mailing list
> >>>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> >>>>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> sakai-pmc mailing list
> >>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> >>>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
> >>>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect -
> http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
>
> ______
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
>
> __________
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
More information about the sakai-pmc
mailing list