[sakai-pmc] PROPOSAL: svn cleanup

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

Hi,

While it's not dangerous anymore, I don't understand its usefulness.

Cheers,

J-F

On 17/12/2013 00:36, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This proposal was blocked by Seth and JFL with a -1 each. I addressed
> JFL's concerns which should hopefully allow him to reverse his vote,
> however I haven't heard back and have emailed twice.
>
> I now request the PMC chair call a roll call vote so that this can be
> decided upon since there were PMC members that contributed positively to
> the discussion and suggested amendments which are reasonable.
>
> The proposal (revised after feedback) is this:
>
> ------------------
>
> The main Sakai SVN (https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/
> <https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/>) currently holds a number of
> deprecated / out of date projects including:
>
>   * blog
>   * discussion
>   * db
>   * jcr
>   * mini
>   * osid
>   * release-mgmt
>   * samples
>   * sdata
>   * site-association
>   * svn-admin
>   * triples
>   * ux
>   * was
>   * wsrp
>
>
> These projects will be moved to /svn/deprecated. At this stage they will
> not be moving to contrib. (Note hybrid and purepoms were removed from
> the list and will not be touched)
>
> All of those in the above list will be moved. Some of these have already
> been moved to /contrib/deprecated (ie discussion) but duplicates exist
> in the main SVN. These will have their dupes removed.
>
> There are also these two projects that are institution specific and
> appear to be unmaintained:
>
>   * gradtools
>   * oncourse
>
>
> Both IU and UMich have indicated these are no longer used and can be
> deleted, so these two will be deleted as part of this cleanup work as well.
>
> This kind of maintenance will reduce confusion and assist with any
> possible repository move that may occur in the future.
> ------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Steve Swinsburg
> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com <mailto:steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     This proposal has been blocked by two -1 votes. As per the Sakai PMC
>     Governance model, this will be taken onto the PMC list for more
>     discussion
>
>     regards,
>     Steve
>
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu
>     <mailto:slt at columbia.edu>> wrote:
>
>         On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Steve Swinsburg
>         <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com <mailto:steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>>
>         wrote:
>          > Seth, see earlier clarification. Projects will now be moved
>         to /svn/deprecated, not contrib.
>          >
>          > It is important to get the repository into a cleaner state
>         before a move to another repository is attempted.
>
>         I see little gain in moving a project to /svn/deprecated and agree
>         with Anthony's previous point that about it. As such, I maintain my
>         -1.
>
>         Seth