[Building Sakai] Help needed with fresh local CM implementation to be

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

Hi David,

This implementation and its packing are local so I don't see any problem 
with keeping an implementing class reference.

J-F

David Horwitz a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> The idea of the ID is that it should be independent of the implemention 
> - that way you can change your implementing class without having to 
> change the id and every place it is referenced ....
> 
> David
> 
> Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>> Thanks for your input, Zach.
>>
>> I find it easier on my side to use the implementing class name as id. Is 
>> it dangerous?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Jean-Francois
>>
>> Zach A. Thomas a écrit :
>>   
>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> nested exception is
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No  
>>>> bean
>>>> named
>>>> 'fr 
>>>> .upmc 
>>>> .sakai.coursemanagement.dummy.CourseManagementServiceUPMCDummyImpl'
>>>> is defined
>>>>
>>>> Could someone help me with this?
>>>>       
>>> On a first glance, it looks like you're trying to reference a bean by  
>>> the name of its implementing class, rather than its id (or name).
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Zach
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-dev mailing list
>> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev