[Building Sakai] Help needed with fresh local CM implementation to be

[David Horwitz]

Hi

The idea of the ID is that it should be independent of the implemention
- that way you can change your implementing class without having to
change the id and every place it is referenced ....

David

Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
> Thanks for your input, Zach.
>
> I find it easier on my side to use the implementing class name as id. Is 
> it dangerous?
>
> cheers,
> Jean-Francois
>
> Zach A. Thomas a écrit :
>   
>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> nested exception is
>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No  
>>> bean
>>> named
>>> 'fr 
>>> .upmc 
>>> .sakai.coursemanagement.dummy.CourseManagementServiceUPMCDummyImpl'
>>> is defined
>>>
>>> Could someone help me with this?
>>>       
>> On a first glance, it looks like you're trying to reference a bean by  
>> the name of its implementing class, rather than its id (or name).
>>
>> cheers,
>> Zach
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20090612/d0a9d8cd/attachment.html