[Building Sakai] Rwiki

Sean Keesler sean at keesler.org
Fri Jul 17 22:01:19 PDT 2009


Just to be clear, the interruption in the flow occurs in traditional
authoring tools when I am typing along and realize that I want to create
another page about [this idea].

What do I do now? I stop and open another window...author a little nothing
of a page so I can link to it...save it somewhere (where should I put it?
lesse...) and back to my original document and put in the hyperlink to my
stub.

Now...what was I writing about? Where did my flow go?

Sean


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Charlie Macchia
<cmacchia at brainovision.com>wrote:

>  On 7/17/09 6:51 PM, "Sean Keesler" <sean at keesler.org> wrote:
>
> One of the real powers of wiki's for teaching is the ability to stub out
> ideas and create links to non-existent pages. The result is an invitation to
> extend and flesh out the rough ideas. Wiki syntax isn't particularly
> important...but the idea that you can easily state an area you, you peers,
> or your students need to come back to and address later without interrupting
> the flow of ideas IS. A traditional google doc approach doesn't really
> capture that important functionality (unless I don't use it right ;).
>
> I can't help but but notice that many of the TWSIA uses of wikis involved
> student "exploration" and "constructionist" uses that probably exploited the
> ability of a wiki to facilitate organic growth and exploration of
> interesting areas of student learning.
>
> Sean
>
>
> … as a musician (
> http://homepage.mac.com/charliemacchia/iMovieTheater10.html ) I think I
> understand the process of constructionist efficiency, though I’ve never
> called it that before; a bad tool can get in the way, or worse, side-track –
> most dangerously - *without the ‘constructors’ even being aware that
> they’re being sandbagged*: this is why so many folks with MIDI studios
> write terrible music, their brains get creative, then something happens
> which halts the process and involves the tool, and now due to the tool, they
> have to spend most of their energies problem solving rather than creating –
> this makes every creative idea far more a case of heavy lifting than it
> should be ( hint, there’s a reason the best song writers can sing and play
> and instrument at the same time ).
>
> So, I appreciate your comment about the efficiency of the tool, by way of
> creating stubs – you can guide and invite, while avoiding getting trapped –
> nice.
>
> In short, it’s not the specific syntax of the tool that matters, in that
> specific instance, it’s the ability to create this feature – along with the
> collaborative abilities the tool should have to offer.
>
> Wish I knew more about this …
>
> *Wish I knew more about how to code it …
> *
> Guess that’s the way all this stuff starts out though – I love TinyMCE’s
> interface however, and I’d love to see a wiki-like tool that leverages it,
> and maintains, diffs, history, permissions etc.
>
> Has anybody done a pseudo-wiki with TinyMCE?
>
> Charlie
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20090718/805f0d86/attachment.html 


More information about the sakai-dev mailing list