[sakai-core-team] Subversion -> Github Migration

[Matthew Jones]

I believe though that even if we don't go with the uPortal model we'll have
a group considered "Committers" (Formerly SVN Admins) and "Contributors"
(Formely people who submitted patches). I think the workflow for these two
groups is different though. Where Committers can just (for now) merge or
push their own pull request. Contributors won't be able to do this step,
and have to have someone else do this for them. I saw the first a pull
request from Charles Hedrick and things like that I'm not interested in
pushing the button every-time for. ;)

Am I correct on this?

I have added everyone formerly in the Sakai Admins svn group that has
recently contributed to the Sakai Admins git team.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
wrote:

> Right, and this really isn't a Sakai specific thing anyway. uPortal has
> their code in git now, Matterhorn has their code in git. I'm betting that
> other Apereo projects are also using git. So basically to contribute to any
> Apereo project you'll probably want to be familiar with git and they'll
> have similar workflow models. Limiting the audience to Sakai I don't think
> has much of an advantage given how many topics there are lately. A general
> "one git to cover them all" and maybe a short piece from a few of the major
> projects would be best.
>
> And I'm without Aaron, someone would need to take a lead on the Sakai
> bootcamp, if there is going to be one in 2015. I feel that the topics would
> probably need to completely change for next year anyway. Especially with
> the new portal, a focus on newer development techniques (client-side/REST)
> and frameworks over legacy, CXF web services and continuing improvements on
> LTI. Previous bootcamps mostly focused around classic skinning techniques,
> utilizing Sakai internal services and basic administration.
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Charles Severance <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
>
>> I think that this is a good idea as part of any Sakai bootcamp.   By then
>> as Matt says - it will be second nature.
>>
>> It probably does not warrant its own workshop.   But it might be cool to
>> have a talk about the cool transition from SVN to GIT.
>>
>> /Chuck
>>
>> On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com> wrote:
>>
>> It seems like 6 months from now would be too late for that type of
>> orientation. People wanting to commit will be already doing it by then.
>>
>> And really everything anyway should need to know specific to Sakai would
>> should be able to be communicated by a few pages on confluence or in a
>> really short period of time. Everything else related to git in general is
>> too large a subject and too non-specific to learning that it seems better
>> to just self study on your own?
>>
>> http://git-scm.com/doc
>> https://www.codeschool.com/courses/git-real
>> http://gitref.org/
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-core-team/attachments/20141229/9dc60bb7/attachment-0001.html