[Contrib: Evaluation System] Fwd: Some UI updates to run by the community

Thu Jan 19 08:49:44 PST 2012

Hi again,

Just to confirm...the save and complete later and cancel actions are a  
configuration option.  See the first subtask on this jira, https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1156 
, for more information.

-Daphne

On Jan 18, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Daphne Ogle wrote:

> Hi Rick,
>
> Thanks for the response and questions.  Responses inline...
>
> -Daphne
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Rick Moyer wrote:
>
>> Daphne,
>>
>>             Concerning the Evaluation page….
>>
>>             I’ve attached a sample of UMD campus wide evaluation,  
>> which raises the following questions….
>>
>>             How will N/A be displayed ?
> The scale shown in our wireframes will just be an additional option  
> available so the scale you use (called stepped I believe) shouldn't  
> be affected.
>>
>> Am I correct that the middle radio buttons labels will not be  
>> displayed, just Strongly Disagree – Neutral – Strongly Agree ?
> The new scale we are interested in has 3 labels, one above the first  
> radio button, one above the middle radio button and one above the  
> last radio button.  However, we've uncovered some accessibility  
> issues with this scale so may not use it all now.  That said, you  
> will still be able to use the scales you are already using.
>>
>> How will the smaller scales be displayed ?
> There won't be a change to existing scales.  We are just looking at  
> creating new one.
>>
>> Primary and secondary questions bold or not ?  When entering a  
>> question or item header, the FCKeditor allows you the option to  
>> bold or not and quite a few others. I would hate to see this option  
>> taken away.
> I wasn't aware that this was something set by the user.  We  
> definitely will not take away this ability.  I suppose it will just  
> be a default for us.  That said, the bolded questions is work that  
> will be done in our local skin and not affect the Sakai skin.
>>
>> Will the Save & complete later button be an option on the  
>> administrate screen ?  This is not something we are interested in.
> If there are schools that don't want those options, and I hear now  
> that there are, we will make this a configuration for the  
> administrator.
>>
>> Is there an issue with 7pt scales is a question block?  I was able  
>> to process an 8pt scale questions to a template.
> It's not the 7 pt scale, it's only having 3 labels for the 7 pts  
> that we couldn't handle in the system as is.  The other change is to  
> allow the user to choose which scale they want to use for a group of  
> questions.  Currently, question groups automatically use the stepped  
> scale shown in your screen shot.
>
> Hope that helps.  Let me know if you have any other questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>>
>> From: evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>> ] On Behalf Of Daphne Ogle
>> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 7:50 PM
>> To: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> Cc: Stephen Marquard; Tracey Bolton; Gary Thompson
>> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Fwd: Some UI updates to run  
>> by the community
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> After a design review with Gary at Unicon this morning, I realize  
>> that it may not be clear what changes are being proposed as local  
>> versus community changes.  Or at least it wasn't clear to me.  I've  
>> added 2 sections under the wireframes on confluence (below) that  
>> describe changes that would be in our local CSS versus those that  
>> will be made to the community code.  I'm hoping to have some  
>> discussion about those that would affect the main code.  Which  
>> hopefully ends in +1s to make the changes.
>>
>> I'm not sure the best way to do this.  Suggestions?
>>
>> Here are the confluence pages again:
>> https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Dashboards
>> https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Evaluation+page 
>> \
>>
>> -Daphne
>>
>> Btw -- I've copied a few people that I think are fairly active in  
>> the community along with a couple Tracey & Gary who aren't on the  
>> list but are part of our Berkeley project.
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>> From: Daphne Ogle <daphne at media.berkeley.edu>
>> Date: January 12, 2012 1:20:38 PM PST
>> To: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> Cc: Stephen Marquard <marquard at ched.uct.ac.za>
>> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Some UI updates to run by the  
>> community
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> UC Berkeley is running a pilot with Eval Sys this semester.  In prep
>> for the pilot we've been doing requirements analysis for our campus
>> along with user experience and gap analysis of the existing system.
>> For Spring we are going to make some fairly minor updates to the
>> UI...mostly  visual and information design...to support students
>> taking the evaluations and instructors viewing results.  Aaron and
>> other at Unicon are doing the development work with us.  As we move
>> forward to future phases, we'll likely get into some of our deeper
>> requirements around evaluation management including some visual and
>> information design to the administration pages.  For now, I wanted to
>> share our Spring updates with the community and find out if they
>> should be more broadly adopted, which would be out best case
>> scenario.  I've tried to make minimal changes and keep mind that many
>> of you have been running this system for some time now.  That said,
>> I'm new to the community so could be missing something that is more
>> subtle.  And of course, it is different for those of you who have
>> users already familiar with the system as it is.
>>
>> Being new to the community, I'm also not sure what your process is  
>> for
>> getting buy in to make these changes in trunk so I could use some
>> advice there.  I'll start with sharing the designs and jiras and
>> starting a conversation around them.  Feedback, questions, general
>> thoughts encourages and welcome!
>>
>>
>> Dashboard:
>> Designs:  https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Dashboards
>> Jira:  https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1159
>>
>>
>> Evaluation page:
>> Designs:  https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Evaluation+page
>> Jira:  https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1182
>>
>>
>> - Daphne
>>
>>
>>
>> Daphne Ogle-Glenn
>> Senior Interaction Designer
>> University of California, Berkeley
>> Educational Technology Services
>> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
>> cell (925)348-4372
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evaluation mailing list
>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>>  with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>> Daphne Ogle-Glenn
>> Senior Interaction Designer
>> University of California, Berkeley
>> Educational Technology Services
>> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
>> cell (925)348-4372
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <UMD Evaluation Page.jpg>
>
> Daphne Ogle-Glenn
> Senior Interaction Designer
> University of California, Berkeley
> Educational Technology Services
> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
> cell (925)348-4372
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evaluation mailing list
> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>  with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Daphne Ogle-Glenn
Senior Interaction Designer
University of California, Berkeley
Educational Technology Services
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
cell (925)348-4372

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/evaluation/attachments/20120119/d6213c0c/attachment-0001.html 