[Contrib: Evaluation System] Fwd: Some UI updates to run by the community
Daphne Ogle
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
Wed Jan 18 16:16:38 PST 2012
Hi Rick,
Thanks for the response and questions. Responses inline...
-Daphne
On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Rick Moyer wrote:
> Daphne,
>
> Concerning the Evaluation page….
>
> I’ve attached a sample of UMD campus wide evaluation,
> which raises the following questions….
>
> How will N/A be displayed ?
The scale shown in our wireframes will just be an additional option
available so the scale you use (called stepped I believe) shouldn't be
affected.
>
> Am I correct that the middle radio buttons labels will not be
> displayed, just Strongly Disagree – Neutral – Strongly Agree ?
The new scale we are interested in has 3 labels, one above the first
radio button, one above the middle radio button and one above the last
radio button. However, we've uncovered some accessibility issues with
this scale so may not use it all now. That said, you will still be
able to use the scales you are already using.
>
> How will the smaller scales be displayed ?
There won't be a change to existing scales. We are just looking at
creating new one.
>
> Primary and secondary questions bold or not ? When entering a
> question or item header, the FCKeditor allows you the option to bold
> or not and quite a few others. I would hate to see this option taken
> away.
I wasn't aware that this was something set by the user. We definitely
will not take away this ability. I suppose it will just be a default
for us. That said, the bolded questions is work that will be done in
our local skin and not affect the Sakai skin.
>
> Will the Save & complete later button be an option on the
> administrate screen ? This is not something we are interested in.
If there are schools that don't want those options, and I hear now
that there are, we will make this a configuration for the administrator.
>
> Is there an issue with 7pt scales is a question block? I was able
> to process an 8pt scale questions to a template.
It's not the 7 pt scale, it's only having 3 labels for the 7 pts that
we couldn't handle in the system as is. The other change is to allow
the user to choose which scale they want to use for a group of
questions. Currently, question groups automatically use the stepped
scale shown in your screen shot.
Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>
> From: evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org
> ] On Behalf Of Daphne Ogle
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 7:50 PM
> To: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Cc: Stephen Marquard; Tracey Bolton; Gary Thompson
> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Fwd: Some UI updates to run by
> the community
>
> Hi again,
>
> After a design review with Gary at Unicon this morning, I realize
> that it may not be clear what changes are being proposed as local
> versus community changes. Or at least it wasn't clear to me. I've
> added 2 sections under the wireframes on confluence (below) that
> describe changes that would be in our local CSS versus those that
> will be made to the community code. I'm hoping to have some
> discussion about those that would affect the main code. Which
> hopefully ends in +1s to make the changes.
>
> I'm not sure the best way to do this. Suggestions?
>
> Here are the confluence pages again:
> https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Dashboards
> https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Evaluation+page
> \
>
> -Daphne
>
> Btw -- I've copied a few people that I think are fairly active in
> the community along with a couple Tracey & Gary who aren't on the
> list but are part of our Berkeley project.
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> From: Daphne Ogle <daphne at media.berkeley.edu>
> Date: January 12, 2012 1:20:38 PM PST
> To: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Cc: Stephen Marquard <marquard at ched.uct.ac.za>
> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Some UI updates to run by the
> community
>
> Hi all,
>
> UC Berkeley is running a pilot with Eval Sys this semester. In prep
> for the pilot we've been doing requirements analysis for our campus
> along with user experience and gap analysis of the existing system.
> For Spring we are going to make some fairly minor updates to the
> UI...mostly visual and information design...to support students
> taking the evaluations and instructors viewing results. Aaron and
> other at Unicon are doing the development work with us. As we move
> forward to future phases, we'll likely get into some of our deeper
> requirements around evaluation management including some visual and
> information design to the administration pages. For now, I wanted to
> share our Spring updates with the community and find out if they
> should be more broadly adopted, which would be out best case
> scenario. I've tried to make minimal changes and keep mind that many
> of you have been running this system for some time now. That said,
> I'm new to the community so could be missing something that is more
> subtle. And of course, it is different for those of you who have
> users already familiar with the system as it is.
>
> Being new to the community, I'm also not sure what your process is for
> getting buy in to make these changes in trunk so I could use some
> advice there. I'll start with sharing the designs and jiras and
> starting a conversation around them. Feedback, questions, general
> thoughts encourages and welcome!
>
>
> Dashboard:
> Designs: https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Dashboards
> Jira: https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1159
>
>
> Evaluation page:
> Designs: https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/display/EVAL/Evaluation+page
> Jira: https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1182
>
>
> - Daphne
>
>
>
> Daphne Ogle-Glenn
> Senior Interaction Designer
> University of California, Berkeley
> Educational Technology Services
> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
> cell (925)348-4372
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evaluation mailing list
> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
> Daphne Ogle-Glenn
> Senior Interaction Designer
> University of California, Berkeley
> Educational Technology Services
> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
> cell (925)348-4372
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <UMD Evaluation Page.jpg>
Daphne Ogle-Glenn
Senior Interaction Designer
University of California, Berkeley
Educational Technology Services
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
cell (925)348-4372
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/evaluation/attachments/20120118/0c83b180/attachment-0001.html
More information about the evaluation
mailing list