[cle-release-team] [sakai2-tcc] Emerging consensus to focus on 2.10

[Neal Caidin]

What specifically would you like to see in a Big M release?




Neal Caidin
Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
neal.caidin at apereo.org
Skype: nealkdin
Twitter: ncaidin









On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think this could tie in nicely with the CLE 4 (or whatever version) discussion. Why don't we put a hold on getting 2.10 out the door, and take some additional time to invest in a Major (big M) release, targeted for say the end of 2014. 2.9 is in a good place, it can still have a few maint releases here and there during this timeout we can focus on really big items to get into the next Major release.
> 
> S
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 06/09/2013, at 1:21, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Summary
>> -----------------
>> There appears to be an emerging consensus to shift the development focus to 2.10.  If you have concerns about this please speak up. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Supporting evidence
>> ----------------------------------------
>> This consensus is based on :
>> 
>> * The TCC discussion at Open Apereo 2013 (under future release cycles) - https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/2013+Apereo+TCC+Meeting+Notes 
>> 
>> * The email discussion thread - http://sakai-project-mail-list-archives.1343168.n2.nabble.com/sakai2-tcc-CLE-2-9-4-vs-CLE-2-10-effort-tt7591837.html
>> 
>> * Today's CLE release team meeting with approximately 13-14 attending, for which there was consensus to focus on the 2.10 release
>> 
>> 
>> Additional thoughts
>> -----------------------------------
>> It seems to me that there are still some open questions with 2.10, but nothing that would prevent us from shifting development/qa focus onto it. In my mind we still need to flesh out the goals for 2.10, work on a realistic timeline, and perhaps, most difficult of all, decide on a name ! :-)   
>> 
>> 2.9 will continue to be supported as the production release, of course, and we might want some further discussion on the best way to manage the 2.9.x branch and/or community expectations (e.g. keep track of 2.9.x changes post-2.9.3 ; possibly create a 2.9.4 tag at some point [though there was not a lot of enthusiasm on today's CLE call for that strategy], etc.).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If I have misstated anything, please feel free to correct me. 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Neal
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Neal Caidin
>> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
>> neal.caidin at apereo.org
>> Skype: nealkdin
>> Twitter: ncaidin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/attachments/20130905/c7a9d11d/attachment.html