[cle-release-team] [sakai2-tcc] Emerging consensus to focus on 2.10

[Steve Swinsburg]

Anything from the massive list of stuff we have collected, from the past
two conferences TCC meetings etc.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:

> What specifically would you like to see in a Big M release?
>
>
>
>
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> Twitter: ncaidin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think this could tie in nicely with the CLE 4 (or whatever version)
> discussion. Why don't we put a hold on getting 2.10 out the door, and take
> some additional time to invest in a Major (big M) release, targeted for say
> the end of 2014. 2.9 is in a good place, it can still have a few maint
> releases here and there during this timeout we can focus on really big
> items to get into the next Major release.
>
> S
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 06/09/2013, at 1:21, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Summary
> -----------------
> There appears to be an emerging consensus to shift the development focus
> to 2.10.  If you have concerns about this please speak up.
>
>
>
> Supporting evidence
> ----------------------------------------
> This consensus is based on :
>
> * The TCC discussion at Open Apereo 2013 (under future release cycles) -
> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/2013+Apereo+TCC+Meeting+Notes
>
>
> * The email discussion thread -
> http://sakai-project-mail-list-archives.1343168.n2.nabble.com/sakai2-tcc-CLE-2-9-4-vs-CLE-2-10-effort-tt7591837.html
>
> * Today's CLE release team meeting with approximately 13-14 attending, for
> which there was consensus to focus on the 2.10 release
>
>
> Additional thoughts
> -----------------------------------
> It seems to me that there are still some open questions with 2.10, but
> nothing that would prevent us from shifting development/qa focus onto it.
> In my mind we still need to flesh out the goals for 2.10, work on a
> realistic timeline, and perhaps, most difficult of all, decide on a name !
> :-)
>
> 2.9 will continue to be supported as the production release, of course,
> and we might want some further discussion on the best way to manage the
> 2.9.x branch and/or community expectations (e.g. keep track of 2.9.x
> changes post-2.9.3 ; possibly create a 2.9.4 tag at some point [though
> there was not a lot of enthusiasm on today's CLE call for that strategy],
> etc.).
>
>
>
> If I have misstated anything, please feel free to correct me.
>
> Thanks!
> Neal
>
>
>
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> Twitter: ncaidin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/attachments/20130906/51b9eb5e/attachment.html