[samigo-team] design for extended matching

[Aaron Zeckoski]

We will work on some designs and discuss things at the meeting on Tuesday.
Thanks
-AZ


On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Ward, Lynn E. <leward at iupui.edu> wrote:
> IU is very interested in this work.  We need support for both 1 to many
> questions, questions with distractors, or a combination of the two.  I be
> at EDUCAUSE next week and may not be able to attend next, but I look
> forward to seeing the design and specs.
>
> Lynn
>
> ==========================
>
> Lynn Ward, Principal Systems Analyst
> Instructional Technology Systems and Services
> University Information Technology Services <http://uits.iu.edu/>
> Indiana University
> Information Technology and Communications Complex (IT 342J)
> 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202
> Phone: 317-278-5713  E-mail: leward at iupui.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/11/11 6:14 PM, "Aaron Zeckoski" <aaronz at vt.edu> wrote:
>
> OK, I will work with our UX resources to come up with something as a
> proposal and we can discuss on the call next tuesday.
> Thanks
> -AZ
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jacqueline Mai Krueger
> <jamai at stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> If you have the resources to come up with the UI, then go for it. UCT's
>>EMI,
>> which seems to be optimized for supporting medical education, will meet
>> Stanford's requirements so we don't need to invest more time in this
>>area.
>> Some members of the SAMigo working group have expressed interest in UCT's
>> EMI so would probably be interested in what you are proposing to do to
>>the
>> existing matching question type. The next SAMigo working group conference
>> call is Tuesday 10.18 11am (PDT). Call details can be found at
>> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/Samigo+Working+Group. You
>> would be able to receive a lot of useful feedback from the group if you
>>can
>> step through your proposal; even better if you have something to show.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jackie
>>
>>
>> Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>
>> Jackie,
>> Would it possible for you and I to have a quick call on this? I am 90%
>> confident that the UCT work is not going to meet our needs. I can
>> share some details about what we need  but I think we just want to
>> modify the existing matching item to support one to many matching and
>> distractors. I was going to have our UX team come up with the UI for
>> the authoring and delivery portions but my understanding is that your
>> team prefers to do this (which is totally fine with me).
>>
>> What time is convenient to discuss?
>> My number is 540-585-4299 or azeckoski @ skype
>>
>> :-)
>> -AZ
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Jacqueline Mai Krueger
>> <jamai at stanford.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> Stephen and team at UCT defined the requirements for the Extended
>>Matching
>> Item question type. What they came up with satisfied the requirements
>>from
>> the Stanford Medical School instructors. I know that #1 of your
>>requirements
>> is addressed but not sure about #2. I conducted a usability review of the
>> feature with a Medical School instructor back in February of this year
>>and
>> gave feedback to Stephen but have not seen the feature since so I don't
>>know
>> what progress has been made. I am attaching a spec of the feature that I
>> reviewed back in February to give you a sense of what it looks like.
>>Stephen
>> will be a better person to ask detailed questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jackie
>>
>> Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jackie,
>> In short, the requirements we are trying to implement are:
>> 1) Allow matches of 1 to many (so A -> 1 and A -> 2) - currently
>> matching is one to one
>>
>> 2) Allow dummy matching values which are wrong if used and should be
>> omitted to get a 100% correct match
>>
>> So the item should include an option to enable matching for one to
>> many items and dummy items.
>> For example: A,B,C and options 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 : A -> 1, A -> 2, B -> 3,
>> C -> 4, C -> 5 (6,7 are unused)
>>
>> If you want to have a quick call to discuss then I am available.
>> My number is 540-585-4299 or I can call you.
>> :-)
>> -AZ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jacqueline Mai Krueger
>> User Experience Specialist
>> Academic Computing Services - CourseWork
>> Stanford University
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jacqueline Mai Krueger
>> User Experience Specialist
>> Academic Computing Services - CourseWork
>> Stanford University
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>



-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile