[sakai2-tcc] Summary - TCC - CLECC, Wednesday, May 1, 10 am Eastern Daylight/ 2 pm GMT

[Matthew Jones]

Thanks for the info, I agree every two weeks seems to have the right amount
of content. I believe there were 5-6 attendees on the call and the time was
already mentioned to be bad for Megan, so a Doodle pool to see if there is
a new better time is a good idea, as we've been though a time change and
it's been 6 months.

Thanks!


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
> wrote:

> * Discussed CLE 2.9.2 status - want to get an rc02 out as soon as
> possible.  Talked about some specifics, etc.
>
> * Acknowledgments - the recommendation from the group that was on the
> phone was to keep it really simple - just a list of institutions that have
> contributed to 2.9 in any significant way. I'm inclined to go with this
> recommendation, at least for the conference, for a number of reasons - one
> is because the conference is almost here and there isn't much more time to
> work on granularity. The discussion was around that the more granular we
> go, the bigger the risk of offending someone due to perceived unfairness or
> under appreciation, etc.  I still think it may be worth exploring greater
> granularity, and what metrics could be gathered, but likely to need quite a
> bit of vetting, discussion, etc. Plus, it is a big effort, potentially.
>
> * Tools survey - see other TCC thread - I'm going to try and whip up a
> quick survey for TCC to review. It will focus only on tools in the core
> system that are used for teaching and learning, not administrative tools.
> TCC is wanting to provide a query that could be run instead of , or in
> addition to , to the survey to provide information on tool use.
>
> * Jira management - just general discussion. Suggestion was made to get
> feedback from CLE team, which I will do.
>
> * Confluence cleanup- did not get to this agenda item. Will put on agenda
> for next TCC - CLECC meeting in two weeks (May 15).
>
> * I will send out Doodle poll soon to see if we can find a new time to
> accommodate everyone. It's been a while since the last poll to pick this
> time and things may have changed.
>
> Btw, meeting every two weeks is feeling about right to me. Better than
> meeting every week. I think once a month might be too little and would like
> to stick with this schedule for now, if that's okay?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>  Neal Caidin
>
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> AIM: ncaidin at aol.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 1, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org>
> wrote:
>
> Add Confluence clean up to agenda.
>
> B
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org>
> wrote:
>
> Open meeting - non-TCC welcome to attend
>
> When: Wednesday, May 1 (tomorrow), 10 am Eastern Daylight/ 2 pm GMT
>
> Proposed Agenda:
>
> * CLE 2.9.2 status
> * Acknowledgements (Institutional) for conference. Status and how to move
> forward (level of detail/granularity; challenges of time [conference almost
> here]; identifying quantity / quality, etc).  Trying to simplify
> Acknowledgements so we can be ready for the conference. Still would be good
> to identify special key contributions.
> * Tools survey - time permitting. See below.
> * Jira management - ongoing feedback requested on how CLECC can best
> contribute to cleaning up/managing Jira.
>
>
> TCC, any agenda ideas?
>
>
> Teleconference information (Calliflower)
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Default Dial-in Number:+1-323-375-2185
>
> Your Conference Code: 8600146
>
> Join Online:
> http://www.calliflower.com
>
> Find a Dial in number in your city:
> https://apps.calliflower.com/account/call_in_numbers?organizer=328940
>
> Skype:
> Add ‘calliflowerskype’ as a contact in Skype.  You can then call
> Calliflower directly from Skype.
>
>
> Tools Survey idea
> ---------------------------------
>
> Tools Survey idea
>
> Potential goals of a tools survey:
>
> * Highlight tools that are available in Sakai CLE but which many in the
> community might not be as aware of. For example, LTI.
> * Get a sense of the impact of stealthing or removing the rWiki tool
> * Identify potential institutions or individuals who have an interest in
> helping maintain various tools (like rWiki, but could be other tools that
> need attention as well)
> * Make clear the status of the Gradebook 2 tool (my understanding is that
> it is built on technology with incompatible licensing with CLE?)
> * Make visible the requirements of the Assignments vs Assignments 2 tools.
> * Get a sense of the use of Contrib tools. Again with the idea that out of
> this might come some additional resources for development, as well as
> helping to identify needs
> * Get a sense of implicit, explicit or emerging requirements and needs
> overall
>
> Or, as Steve Swinsburg says, maybe a simple survey will work for rWiki:
>
> "A simple survey would do here:
> 1. Do you use the wiki (y/n)
> 2. What so you use it for (options)
> 3. If the wiki went away, how sad would you be (really sad, a bit sad,
> meh, I'd just use another tool, I hate the wiki)"
>
> CLECC goal is to generate conversation and strategies for information that
> would be helpful input to the TCC in decision making processes wrt tool
> needs, and to get input from the community.
>
> Cheers,
> Neal Caidin
>
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> AIM: ncaidin at aol.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130502/b534c40b/attachment.html