[sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits

[Steve Swinsburg]

Keitai - spell it right. jeez. Looks like we need a spellcheck review ;)


On 14/03/2013, at 8:31 PM, Adrian Fish <adrian.r.fish at gmail.com> wrote:

> Alan: I know, you're right - I was just jossing. A decent peer review process between the Ketai team members would be a good idea.
> 
> 
> On 14 March 2013 09:28, Berg, Alan <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:
> Thanks Steve, for the positive and constructive reaction. 
> 
> Adrian, I was seeking  clarification over an objective process.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards, 
>            Alan
> 
> 
> Alan Berg
> 
> Innovation working group
> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
> University of Amsterdam
> From: Adrian Fish [adrian.r.fish at gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 March 2013 10:19
> To: Steve Swinsburg
> Cc: Berg, Alan; sakai2-tcc Committee; Douglas Johnson
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits
> 
> That would imply that someone other than Steve needs to review all the code as Steve will be applying his own standards whilst reviewing. The person who reviews Steve's code should also undergo a review as their code may be rancid. Eventually we'll need to get the new pope involved. He should have the final say.
> 
> 
> On 14 March 2013 09:16, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alan
> 
> Good point. I'm managing the development and technical aspects of the project and will be writing some of the code. I'll be reviewing the contributions of the FK team, but I'm happy for someone to review my own work if people feel that is necessary. 
> 
> Cheers
> Steve
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 14/03/2013, at 19:27, "Berg, Alan" <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>> 
>> Sounds great. Wouldn’t want to get in the way of what looks like a very useful for all project.
>> 
>> However, I am missing a little bit of context from http://www.sakaiproject.org/news/announcing-project-keitai
>> 
>> I hope I misunderstand, please correct me if I am wrong. From the announcement the company writing the code is Flying Kit. You are reviewing their code against a specification for incursion into Sakai CLE. Are you at times judging your own code? If so, it would be logical to have a filter such as the core CLE team in place as one final check.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards, 
>>            Alan
>> 
>> 
>> Alan Berg
>> 
>> Innovation working group
>> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
>> University of Amsterdam
>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Steve Swinsburg [steve.swinsburg at gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 March 2013 03:33
>> To: sakai2-tcc Committee; Douglas Johnson
>> Subject: [sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Project Keitai is underway and very soon there will be some modules being completed for multiple projects. I will be reviewing all work completed to ensure it meets the specifications and is in line with what the Project Keitai committee has agreed upon, but in the interest of meeting the deadline for Phase 1, I hope no one minds these commits going directly in to the various projects? If you do, please contact me.
>> 
>> Code will be added to its own area of each tool for the providers. Where a provider already exists, that one will be reviewed/enhanced if required, but no disruption to any tool/service or existing provider is expected.
>> 
>> Parent task is here, currently a WIP as I add the details for each project.
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23352
>> 
>> regards,
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130314/348c3427/attachment.html