[sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits

[Adrian Fish]

Alan: I know, you're right - I was just jossing. A decent peer review
process between the Ketai team members would be a good idea.


On 14 March 2013 09:28, Berg, Alan <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:

>  Thanks Steve, for the positive and constructive reaction.
>
> Adrian, I was seeking  clarification over an objective process.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>            Alan
>
>
> Alan Berg
>
> Innovation working group
> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
> University of Amsterdam
>      ------------------------------
> *From:* Adrian Fish [adrian.r.fish at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 14 March 2013 10:19
> *To:* Steve Swinsburg
> *Cc:* Berg, Alan; sakai2-tcc Committee; Douglas Johnson
> *Subject:* Re: [sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits
>
>   That would imply that someone other than Steve needs to review all the
> code as Steve will be applying his own standards whilst reviewing. The
> person who reviews Steve's code should also undergo a review as their code
> may be rancid. Eventually we'll need to get the new pope involved. He
> should have the final say.
>
>
> On 14 March 2013 09:16, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Alan
>>
>>  Good point. I'm managing the development and technical aspects of the
>> project and will be writing some of the code. I'll be reviewing the
>> contributions of the FK team, but I'm happy for someone to review my own
>> work if people feel that is necessary.
>>
>>  Cheers
>> Steve
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 14/03/2013, at 19:27, "Berg, Alan" <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:
>>
>>   Hi Steve,
>>
>> Sounds great. Wouldn’t want to get in the way of what looks like a very
>> useful for all project.
>>
>> However, I am missing a little bit of context from
>> http://www.sakaiproject.org/news/announcing-project-keitai
>>
>> I hope I misunderstand, please correct me if I am wrong. From the
>> announcement the company writing the code is Flying Kit. You are reviewing
>> their code against a specification for incursion into Sakai CLE. Are you at
>> times judging your own code? If so, it would be logical to have a filter
>> such as the core CLE team in place as one final check.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>            Alan
>>
>>
>> Alan Berg
>>
>> Innovation working group
>> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
>> University of Amsterdam
>>      ------------------------------
>> *From:* sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [
>> sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Steve Swinsburg
>> [steve.swinsburg at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* 14 March 2013 03:33
>> *To:* sakai2-tcc Committee; Douglas Johnson
>> *Subject:* [sakai2-tcc] Project Keitai commits
>>
>>   Hi all,
>>
>> Project Keitai is underway and very soon there will be some modules being
>> completed for multiple projects. I will be reviewing all work completed to
>> ensure it meets the specifications and is in line with what the Project
>> Keitai committee has agreed upon, but in the interest of meeting the
>> deadline for Phase 1, I hope no one minds these commits going directly in
>> to the various projects? If you do, please contact me.
>>
>>  Code will be added to its own area of each tool for the providers.
>> Where a provider already exists, that one will be reviewed/enhanced if
>> required, but no disruption to any tool/service or existing provider is
>> expected.
>>
>>  Parent task is here, currently a WIP as I add the details for each
>> project.
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23352
>>
>>  regards,
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130314/3355cf22/attachment-0001.html