[sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

[Berg, Alan]

I would like to reinforce Megan's comments. Perhaps it has been announced, but I missed it. Steve mentions an incubation process review. When is the end date of this review, who is involved and how binding is it. Steve please expand on your comments. I know that a couple of colleges in Amsterdam are involved, but it would be nice to have the boundaries defined here for further reflection.

Regards,
           Alan


Alan Berg

Innovation working group
On the use of ICT in Education & Research
University of Amsterdam

________________________________________
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of May, Megan Marie [mmmay at indiana.edu]
Sent: 06 March 2013 22:12
To: Steve Swinsburg; Neal Caidin
Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

Is there some list I should be on so that I get updates from the Apereo foundation?   Since the conference and subsequent merger there doesn't appear to have been any kind of communication ...

Megan

-----Original Message-----
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Steve Swinsburg
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 3:47 PM
To: Neal Caidin
Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

Having a view on what we want in the end would be most valuable. How we get there is a bit more complex though since we have the Jasig infrastructure as well.
We've discussed this on the Board calls to be looked at soon, so it would be good to take something to the board from the CLE side of things.

cheers,
Steve



On 07/03/2013, at 4:15 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi TCC,
>
> I wonder for the future if we should have some discussion about infrastructure issues?  Seems like a good topic to have some discussions and then perhaps create some goals out of those discussions?
>
> I realize that there are resource issues that come into play here, just like everywhere else, but maybe taking time to think about what we would like in an ideal world (blue sky) vs what we have, we can come up with some realistic goals. Fortunately, this is an area I'm not seeing anything that is critical and urgent, but it is important. Perhaps planning now we can avoid urgent/panic issues in the future or just improve the overall experience of Sakaiger wannabees who depend upon our information and systems to implement Sakai effectively.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Do you see any urgent issues with infrastructure?
>
> Cheers,
> Neal
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc