[sakai2-tcc] Is there any reason I should not change the LTI version in trunk to 2.10-SNAPSHOT ??

[Beth Kirschner]

Steve -- at the conference we had discussed abandoning the indie approach to most, if not all tools, in the next major release -- currently to be called 2.10 (or 4.0?). 

Chuck -- I like the idea of changing the next version of LTI to 2.10.
+1

- Beth

On Jun 16, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well if it stays an indie then it becomes super confusing since the version will at some point probably not line up with the reast of the actual 2.10 projects. I discussed this in my proposal, ie purepoms at 2.8.9 or something when the Sakai release is 2.8.2 and other apps at 2.8.6. Head explosion.
> 
> So it depends if you want to have off cycle release. If not and it is all to be rolled into the main release cycle then go for it.
> 
> Was there any discussion on my proposal at the conference?
> 
> cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Charles Severance <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
> I figure no time like the present...
> 
> Of course I would need to fix target versions in JIRA - but that would be easy enough - there are only a few - so I could fix those by hand once I got a 2.10 tentative version.
> 
> Thoughts / comments??
> 
> /Chuck
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc