[sakai2-tcc] Code review process

[Neal Caidin]

I ain't got no idea. I'm not familiar with Crucible and Fisheye, but I presume that whatever features that they offer is what we will get? Like we don't have a choice about how those tools  work do we?

-- neal



Neal Caidin
Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
neal.caidin at apereo.org
Skype: nealkdin
Twitter: ncaidin









On Aug 21, 2013, at 9:33 AM, "Berg, Alan" <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:

> The formatting stuff can be done via PMD with a cut down set of rules and FindBugs also good at focusing attention. Therefore, the code review infrastructure should include some pointers to lines of code with warnings as a start to a proper review. I am hoping this is part of the hostingplan.
> 
> 
> Regards, 
>            Alan
> 
> 
> Alan Berg
> 
> Innovation working group
> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
> University of Amsterdam
> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Steve Swinsburg [steve.swinsburg at gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 August 2013 14:48
> To: Neal Caidin
> Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 2
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Code review process
> 
> Great, thanks Neal.
> 
> cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
> On 21/08/2013, at 10:32 PM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>> 
>> Yes it is still moving forward. 
>> 
>> Because Apereo has two different vendors capable of providing hosting, I was asked by the Apereo Infrastructure group to get information from both. I'm meeting with the second vendor today, so hopefully we will have the complete information needed to make a decision within a couple of days. Then it is my hope that it won't take long (a day or three) to get the green light from the Infrastructure group and we can move forward.
>> 
>> Thanks for asking. I'll do a better job proactively keeping TCC posted.
>> 
>> -- Neal
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Neal Caidin
>> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
>> neal.caidin at apereo.org
>> Skype: nealkdin
>> Twitter: ncaidin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Is the code review process moving forward? I've just been working on some god awful code in the CLE, which doesn't adhere to any sort of standard for formatting, whitespace, line breaks, or even modern practices in regards to the technology it is using, and its driving me up the wall. 
>>> 
>>> Last we discussed this we were looking at Crucible or Fisheye possibly? Any movement there?
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130821/1c9dcf8f/attachment.html