[sakai2-tcc] CLA process discussion

[Matthew Jones]

Infrastructure is currently a private project. This was the current
recommendation for the past X months for anyone new. Create a Jira account,
put the CLA on this jira. There is no way to mail or fax it, it has to be
scanned and done like this.

Though none of the documentation was ever updated to reflect this, though
Chris and I basically told anyone asking if they wanted to be able to
commit on SVN this was how it had to go.

I agree though with Apereo that the process for all Jasig/Sakai should be
the same and managed by the foundation (or Concentra) like it was in the
past. If they want to fund the writing of some database submission and
retention system like Mark advocates for (or maybe already have one),
awesome, but nobody on this list is going to write that. That would make
the "signing" process easier though as the click wrap agreements are
essentially just the same as someones signature (if done correctly)


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Steve Swinsburg
<steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm not sure why we can't just use a private project in Jira for this, and
> that is where people submit but not see others submissions, and give the
> relevant people access to the project, but if it has to be an external
> party then so be it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 18/04/2013, at 3:12, Noah Botimer <botimer at umich.edu> wrote:
>
> > For the record, this all sounds right and good to me. While we maintain
> a contract for this support, it should be Concentra's responsibility,
> provided that we (to be defined) have ready and unfettered access to the
> information. I don't think that's in question, but would like to be sure
> that those who may be called upon to refer to the files understand how to
> do so.
> >
> > We're now a single organization with shared licensing values, so a
> single, non-individual contact point is appropriate, even if there is a bit
> of per-project variation at present.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Noah
> >
> > On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Seth Theriault wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Since Concentra was accepting agreements, etc. for Jasig, they should
> >>> handle the Sakai ones as well now.
> >>
> >> Reference point for Jasig's licensing:
> >>
> >> http://www.jasig.org/licensing
> >>
> >> I highly recommend that we simply adopt the same contact information
> >> for the agreements and perhaps a redirected licensing at sakaiproject.org
> >> can be used for questions. Having actual names is just a recipe for
> >> disaster.
> >>
> >> Seth
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> >> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> >> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sakai2-tcc mailing list
> > sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130417/fa6972ac/attachment.html