[sakai2-tcc] CLA process discussion

[Steve Swinsburg]

I'm not sure why we can't just use a private project in Jira for this, and that is where people submit but not see others submissions, and give the relevant people access to the project, but if it has to be an external party then so be it. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 18/04/2013, at 3:12, Noah Botimer <botimer at umich.edu> wrote:

> For the record, this all sounds right and good to me. While we maintain a contract for this support, it should be Concentra's responsibility, provided that we (to be defined) have ready and unfettered access to the information. I don't think that's in question, but would like to be sure that those who may be called upon to refer to the files understand how to do so.
> 
> We're now a single organization with shared licensing values, so a single, non-individual contact point is appropriate, even if there is a bit of per-project variation at present.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Noah
> 
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Seth Theriault wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Since Concentra was accepting agreements, etc. for Jasig, they should
>>> handle the Sakai ones as well now.
>> 
>> Reference point for Jasig's licensing:
>> 
>> http://www.jasig.org/licensing
>> 
>> I highly recommend that we simply adopt the same contact information
>> for the agreements and perhaps a redirected licensing at sakaiproject.org
>> can be used for questions. Having actual names is just a recipe for
>> disaster.
>> 
>> Seth
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc