[sakai2-tcc] Planning for Sakai 2.10 and beyond

[Steve Swinsburg]

I don't think I should be forced to withdraw my suggestions, that isn't what this free and open community is all about. In any case, what I called for, and what you think I called for, are very different approaches.

I never said the TCC was incapable of anything non-technical. I said that it should not be muddied by this task. By its very nature and name, the TCC *is* technical. I know the reasons behind the name, I was there. However if this group, the TCC, is the group that undertakes the community consultation, develops the roadmap, and rallies resources to get things done (the things that I have said we need to do), then so be it, but we should change the name of this group to better reflect the role that the group is taking.

regards,
Steve


On 25/09/2012, at 3:00 AM, Charles Severance <csev at umich.edu> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 24, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Nate Angell wrote:
> 
>> I move we all drop further discussion of that chapter and only talk
>> about what we are going to do next.
> 
> I am happy to drop all further discussion about the past as long as Steve withdraws his suggestion that we recreate the PC or something similar because he sees the TCC as incapable of doing anything non-technical (as he states in his blog post).
> 
> /Chuck
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20120925/56ae7d29/attachment.html