[sakai2-tcc] CLE community poll

[Aaron Zeckoski]

OK, here is my attempt at creating the survey. The email and stuff at
the top might be a bit much but take a look and see what you think. We
may want to simply drop that or move it to the end.

I would like to send this out later today so have a look and send me
any final feedback.
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/38PWRKG

-AZ


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:02 AM, csev <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Seth Theriault wrote:
>
>
> I suggest that we distribute the survey first to the partners
> (institutional reps) list and then after a week or so, put it out
> generally. That way you capture everyone who cares to participate
> AND make sure the dues-payers have multiple opportunities to
> respond.
>
> Identifying info, even just an institution, would be good to
> capture.
>
> Seth
>
>
> I disagree with the notion of doing this through the foundation and to
> partners only first - it may be a later step - but not the first.
>
> The results we will get will be probabilistic at best and the response rate
> for this kind of thing are tough when the person getting the survey needs to
> forward it to someone else.    It will take weeks not days to get the data.
>
> I have a feeling that the data will be quite clear and very helpful even if
> it is very partial.  I actually don't know what the answers will turn out to
> be - but I think they will be easy to interpret and be consistent across
> virtually any sample (scientific or otherwise) we might choose.
>
> Again another purpose of this is gentle education and awareness of community
> members and a better connection between the TCC and community.
>
> If the board made a survey - it should go to formal members if they so
> choose and that would make perfect sense.
>
> Perhaps after we get the broad results, it might trigger the same or
> slightly different survey to come from the board to the formal partners.
>
> I would suggest we add a checkbox on out less-scientific survey asking if
> someone is the formal rep - and perhaps another box (optional) for email and
> a check as to whether we can contact them and an open box with "do you have
> any other comments for the TCC?".
>
> Letting the board see this and giving them a change to comment and adjust is
> a very good idea - I would say essential.  Anything else would be very rude.
>  Not so much to ask permission - but to inform them and ask for comments
> (RFC...).   Give them some time to review and comment and then we proceed.
>
> /Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>

-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile