[sakai2-tcc] Letter to the OAE steering committee?

Berg, Alan A.M.Berg at uva.nl
Wed Mar 21 08:07:23 PDT 2012


In which the customer assumes: 1) that the co-evolution of the two products is being orchestrated and 2) at some point in time Y transference  is seamless.


Alan

Alan Berg

Group Education and Research Services
Central Computer Services
University of Amsterdam

________________________________________
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Aaron Zeckoski [aaronz at vt.edu]
Sent: 21 March 2012 15:59
To: csev
Cc: Sakai 2 Technical Coordination Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Letter to the OAE steering committee?

>> A question I am interested in that may need some re-wording to achieve the neutrality goal: Have the primary differences between the CLE and OAE projects been adequately communicated?
>
> I think that is pretty well communicated.   It may not be well implemented - but the approach is pretty clear (for now).

I still have clients (and others) asking me if they should upgrade to
OAE this year and I still have to explain that it has almost none of
the functionality of CLE and is really a different product with a
different goal.
I am sure that people in the inner circle understand the differences
but I think a lot of the community (and especially people outside the
community looking in) still does not.

-AZ



On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, csev <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Sam Ottenhoff wrote:
>
>> * What version of Sakai CLE do you currently run in production?  2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.x would all be one option not multiple options
>>
>> * What version of Sakai CLE do you plan to be running in production on Dec 31, 2012?
>>
>> * Will the sum of your local commitment to Sakai (development, QA, training, etc) increase, decrease, or stay the same over the next 12 months?
>
> I would avoid these last two.
>
>> A question I am interested in that may need some re-wording to achieve the neutrality goal: Have the primary differences between the CLE and OAE projects been adequately communicated?
>
> I think that is pretty well communicated.   It may not be well implemented - but the approach is pretty clear (for now).
>
>> Is a question about funding out of scope?  Organizational capability of one-time funding increase to get us over the funding roadbump (as described by the ED)?
>
> No - lets use this to inform any funding ask.   Lets gather funding neutral info with an open mind.
>
> /Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc



--
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc


More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list