[sakai2-tcc] Letter to the OAE steering committee?

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

The issue with maintenance branches is we don't know if this is a 
3-months, 6, 12 or more old revision.

J-F

On 21/03/2012 15:21, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
> Sounds good, and the release/branch thing would definitely be good to know.
>
> Maybe enumerate them all in the list?
>
> 2.5 or earlier
> 2.6.1
> 2.6.2
> 2.6.3
> 2.6.x maintenance branch
> 2.7.0
> 2.7.1
> 2.7.2
> 2.7.x maintenance branch
> and so on.
>
> cheers,
> s
>
>
>
>
> On 22/03/2012, at 1:13 AM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>
>> OK, so how about this for starters?
>> ------
>> What version of Sakai are you running in Production (as of Jan 2012)?
>> 2.5 or earlier
>> 2.6
>> 2.7
>> 2.8
>> 2.9 or other unreleased version
>>
>> When is your next Sakai upgrade planned to go into Production?
>> NOTE: Only consider Sakai framework version upgrades and not local changes
>> Q2 2012 (April - June)
>> Q3 2012 (July - September)
>> Q4 2012 (October - December)
>> 2013
>> 2014 or later
>>
>> What version of Sakai do you plan to upgrade to next?
>> CLE 2.7
>> CLE 2.8
>> CLE 2.9 or other unreleased version
>> OAE 1.*
>> --------
>> Maybe only ask about 2.6 and earlier?
>> Should we also ask if they are running a release or a maint branch? I
>> think this would be valuable to find out.
>>
>> -AZ