[sakai2-tcc] Letter to the OAE steering committee?

[Matthew Jones]

I agree,

I think it's mostly questions like

Sakai CLE community questionnaire possible questions:

1) What version of Sakai CLE are you running in production?
 1A) Do you typically use a numbered release (2.7.1) or a branch release
(2.7.x)?
 2B) Are you locally hosted, or hosted by a Sakai Commercial Affiliate?

2) Are you running Sakai OAE (hybrid or standalone) in production, if so
what version?
2A) If not, more OAE followup questions about their interest in OAE?

3) If your institution was considering an upgrade to a newer version of the
Sakai CLE, what Time Frame would you consider upgrading
  - 3 - 6 months, 6 months - 1 year , 1 year - 2 years, 2 years +

3A) If user chose anything other than 3-6 months, what factors make you
consider postponing upgrade
  - Possible choices include: Too many local modifications, Not enough
local developers, Don't trust QA of new versions, Upgrade process
confusing, Other (specify?)

4) Does your institution build and customize the release from source?
(Maybe some followups here concerning contributing back?)

5) Which new tools or features planned or present are you most interested
in picking up in future versions of the Sakai CLE
  - Possible choices include: Lesson builder, Neoportal, Dashboard,
Zip/Unzip in Resources, Soft Deletes . . .(Any others?)

6) Which existing tools in the Sakai CLE are you most interested in
seeing improvements on
  - Resources, Assignments, Gradebook, Polls, Wiki

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:48 AM, csev <csev at umich.edu> wrote:

>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>
> >> However, I think it's important that any survey has a positive/neutral
> spin so it is viewed as that of a data collection tool only, rather than a
> plea for help which may cause people to prematurely jump ship.
>
> I agree that this needs to be 100% neutral.  We need ask positively about
> interest in Sakai 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 and OAE.
>
> We need to be open about needs - but not imply panic / impending failure.
>
> /Chuck
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20120321/5287f674/attachment.html