[sakai2-tcc] Cleaning up versions in Jira

[Matthew Jones]

I mean on Jira, if you put in an affects version of 2.7.x it is useless
because it could be 2.7.x svn revision 69630 where there was a problem or
svn revision 93259. The branch itself like trunk is meaningless without the
revision number attached, but has meaning with the revision, especially
since we don't tag many releases. It's possible if someone is on an older
'.x' that it could be fixed in a newer '.x'. At least for the tag, the
revision is fixed.

-Matthew

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, David Horwitz <david.horwitz at uct.ac.za>wrote:

> **
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> On 07/06/2011 04:26 PM, Matthew Jones wrote:
>
> Where was this discussed at? While I'll agree the .x and trunk pretty alone
> useless as an affects or fixed, I can see both being useful if there was a
> version number attached to it.
>
>
> I raised this at the project planing meeting. What do you mean by "if there
> was a version number attached to it". There is always the the version for
> the next release of a branch (indicated by the [Tentative]) and listed in
> Jira in the "Unreleased" heading.
>
>
>  I think I'd still leave the latest 2.5 as a version, as people are still
> running that and people are still fixing it. However I'd *guess* that most
> are on 2.5.x, but that wouldn't be selectable right?
>
>  2.5.7 and 2.5.x have been archived for some time - I'm not aware of any
> branch merges that have been done since Steve Swinsberg did the last
> official round. It seems to me that most schools that are on 2.5 are working
> on migrating (based on what I've seen on list but are could be wrong).
>
>
> D
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:34 AM, David Horwitz <david.horwitz at uct.ac.za>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As discussed in LA we suggested getting rid of the x versions, so unless
>> I hear otherwise I will archive the following versions:
>>
>>
>>
>> - 2.6.x
>> -2.7.x
>> -2.8.x
>>
>> Archiving means that issues that where tagged as affecting or fixed in
>> those versions will still display this, however those versions will no
>> longer appear in the dropdowns.
>>
>> I would also suggest we archive the 2.5 versions:
>> 2.5.0
>> 2.5.1
>> 2.5.2
>> 2.5.3
>> 2.5.4
>> 2.5.5
>> 2.5.6
>>
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20110706/777f3be0/attachment.html