[sakai2-tcc] Captcha support 2.8 for new accounts

[Anthony Whyte]

JFL objection:

"-1 because we are past the code freeze/branching and this might slow down the process."

Jean-Francois, would you be willing to withdraw your -1 vote?  As I noted in my +1 vote: 

1.  It's off by default which helps mitigate risk.
2.  QA supports inclusion.
3.  We have branched in mid-September, not mid-November; we have time before the XMas holidays to test it
4.  It does not appear "rushed" to me.  Expedited after a long lag seems to me the more appropriate description.

I doubt adding captcha support will slow down the process.  But that's my opinion and it may not be shared by others.

However, if -1 holds I propose we hold a roll call vote on this one.  This is a feature that we should have added long ago.

Cheers,

Anthony


On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Apologies for the lateness of this summation (long weekend), but voting is now closed. We had 4 explicit +1 votes from TCC members, one implicit +1 from myself (in making the proposal), and one -1 vote. Considering the -1 vote and in accordance with our charter, action is now blocked.
> 
> I am not sure how we should proceed. Our charter says this can be overridden with a 2/3 majority roll call, but I will defer to our humble and wise TCC leaders Seth and Megan.
> 
> cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 22/09/2010, at 2:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
> 
>> Committed to trunk (2.9)
>> 
>> I propose that this goes into 2.8. Voting is now open and will close at midnight on Friday the 24th September 2010 (US EST).
>> 
>> As per the Sakai 2 TCC Governance (http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Home) voting is by lazy consensus, or you may nominate a +1, 0 or -1 vote. -1 votes must be accompanied by a detailed explanation. A single -1 vote based on a material objection will block action. However, -1 blocking votes can be overridden by a 2/3 majority roll call vote of active TCC members.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Steve
>> 
>> p.s. Thanks very much to Alan for picking this up and to Chuck for reviewing. Well done!
>> 
>> On 22/09/2010, at 2:31 PM, csev wrote:
>> 
>>> I just tested this and it is fine - I added some commentary to the JIRA:
>>> 
>>> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-12489
>>> 
>>> I recommend Steve that you commit it to trunk (2.9-SNAPSHOT as of a few hours ago) and let the TCC contemplate if it can go into 2-8-x as it sees fit.  If it does wait until 2.9, then at least this way it does not languish in JIRA for three more years.
>>> 
>>> I would also note that Alan originally proposed this for inclusion, Steve agreed, and now I agree.  So that makes 2.1 TCC votes for inclusion already (given that most people discount everything I say).
>>> 
>>> /Chuck
>>> 
>>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ok I've reviewed this and it looks good.
>>>> I've attached an updated patch to the JIRA that works in trunk, as well as a screenshot.
>>>> 
>>>> I would *really* like to see this in even though it slipped the documentation dates.
>>>> 
>>>> It is disabled by default.
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Steve
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3829 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20100927/29525890/attachment.bin