[sakai2-tcc] [maint] Maintenance Branches: Enhancement vs Bug Merges

[Beth Kirschner]

I believe the intent is that the institution doing the merge is responsible for testing. Perhaps we could require a Test Plan be documented and followed in the JIRA?

- Beth

On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Seth Theriault wrote:

> Beth Kirschner wrote:
> 
>> - The change must be QA tested with the maintenance branch 
>>  before the merge
> 
> I'd like to hear whether QA and RelMgmt thinks they have the 
> capacity to support this condition given that we are currently 
> maintaining and/or testing up to a half-dozen "releases" at a 
> time (currently 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, plus their respective kernels) 
> plus the indies.
> 
> Seth
> 
> 
>