[sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)

Steve Swinsburg steve.swinsburg at gmail.com
Sat Aug 21 17:08:06 PDT 2010


+1 as well, however still no mention of indie projects. I assume we are tracking the same timeline, so suggest we explicitly mention projects on an indie release in the appropriate parts of this timeline. 


cheers,
Steve


On 22/08/2010, at 8:50 AM, May, Megan Marie wrote:

> My 2 cents - I would expect the majority of time to be spent testing beta tags.    
> 
> Hopefully we'll reach Beta and RC prior to the dates that are outlined.  It's my thinking that if we aren't there by those dates, we are looking at a delayed release.  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Zeckoski
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 10:53 AM
> To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)
> 
> +1 with the note that we seem to be spending an awful lot of time in
> beta and RCs (shouldn't those be sort of "as needed"?) Maybe I am
> misreading the schedule so apologies if I am not reading it right.
> 
> :-)
> -AZ
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:
>> May, Megan Marie wrote:
>> 
>>> The schedule for 2.8 release activity has been updated to
>>> reflect comments collected as well as the discussion from
>>> Wednesday.
>>> 
>>> It is available at
>>> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org//x/8RkhB.
>>> 
>>> I propose we vote to adopt this timeline.
>> 
>> The motion is seconded (by your chair) and is now OPEN for
>> voting. The vote will remain open until 23:59 UTC on Monday,
>> August 23, 2010.
>> 
>> NOTE: In the interest of time and given the significant
>> previous discussion, the voting period is SHORTER than usual.
>> 
>> As a reminder, this is a public, on-list vote with a "+1"
>> signifying "adoption of the 2.8 timeline as proposed."
>> 
>> Per our governance documents, a -1 vote must be accompanied by
>> a detailed explanation. A single -1 vote based on a material
>> objection will block action. However, -1 blocking votes can be
>> overridden by a 2/3 majority roll call vote of active TCC
>> members.
>> 
>> Seth
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Engineer - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc



More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list