[WG: Sakai QA] [samigo-team] [Important] SAM-973 for CLE 2.9.2 ?

[Karen Tsao]

Yeah. Maybe we can get it tested again and record the steps.

Thanks,
Karen


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
> wrote:

> Hi Karen,
>
> Maybe I misunderstood then, if it is completely fixed. Perhaps it needs
> some more testing. My understanding is that the GUI piece was fixed but not
> the part related to grading Fill in the Blank questions.
>
> Should I ask for QA help to retest and document any steps to reproduce
> problems (if any)?
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
> On May 2, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Karen Tsao <ktsao at stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> Can I know what has not fixed in this JIRA? I thought the issue is fixed?
> Maybe I miss something?
>
> Thanks,
> Karen
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Neal Caidin <
> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> The CLE team did not identify this as one of the issues to get resolved
>> for RC02 (to be honest, I didn't bring it up based on this thread :-p ).
>>
>> But we still have the original quesiton open about whether this should
>> get merged into 2.9.x (after 2.9.2) and a new ticket opened with Fill in
>> the Blank grading?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Neal
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I see no problem with Neal or the QA team raising potential concerns,
>> even between release candidates.  We've got a long standing ticket triage
>> process in place on the release team plus two branch managers with long
>> experience managing 2.9.x.
>>
>> Indeed, I find it both refreshing and encouraging that we can actually
>> talk of the QA team as an actual entity doing good work.  Like Megan though
>> I encourage everyone to consider carefully the cost/benefit to the
>> community of delaying a release in order to pull in just one more
>> non-blocking fix or a few more like it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Anth
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Megan,
>>
>> My thought process is one of gathering information, not making decisions.
>> I think there are enough checks and balances in the process that hopefully
>> your concerns can be allayed. I see these decisions as ultimately to be
>> made by the CLE release team, correct?
>>
>> You've got a great point and I agree, I would not consider this a blocker
>> for 2.9.2. Does that mean we should not consider adding it? There are a few
>> more like this, where a bug fix has been made and verified in trunk, and it
>> seems like "low hanging fruit" to merge it in and make 2.9.2 even a little
>> better as we head towards rc02. I think rc02 is almost an inevitable need,
>> btw. I can understand if you are worried about scope creep.
>>
>> I would prefer to bring these different issues up, especially as they are
>> being brought to my attention by QA testers, and, like I said, gather
>> information for input to the CLE release team. We can always choose to push
>> the issues to 2.9.3 and then we will have a jump start having answered some
>> questions and move some progress on these tickets.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Neal
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 4:31 PM, "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay at indiana.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Neal,2****
>>    I’m really, really, really, really concerned that bugs that are not
>> flagged as **blockers**  keep being brought up as candidates for release.
>> ****
>>
>> SAM-973 has existed since 2.6.3 . . . why isn’t it being flagged for
>> 2.9.3 like some of the other issues that have been raised? ****
>>
>> Megan****
>>
>>
>> *From:* samigo-team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:samigo-
>> team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Neal Caidin
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2013 4:18 PM
>> *To:* Samigo Team
>> *Cc:* sakai-qa at collab.sakaiproject.org QA;
>> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> *Subject:* [samigo-team] [Important] SAM-973 for CLE 2.9.2 ?
>> *Importance:* High****
>> ** **
>> Dear Samigo Team,****
>> ** **
>> The QA team reviewed opened Jiras that potentially need to be addressed
>> for CLE 2.9.2 (and specifically to get into 2.9.2-rc02, release candidate
>> 02).****
>> ** **
>> We have a question/suggestion for
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-973****
>> ** **
>> We believe that SAM-973 is actually two issues. One is a GUI issue which
>> has been fixed and verified in trunk. The GUI issue was sometimes
>> displaying incorrect answers as though they were the correct answers (with
>> green checkmarks). We think that this issue should have the 2.9.x merge
>> flag set and be merged into 2.9.2-rc02.****
>> ** **
>> The other issue in SAM-973 is a problem with grading Fill in the Blank
>> answers. This does not yet appear to be fixed and may or may not need
>> additional discussion. For this one we suggest opening a separate ticket.
>> ****
>> ** **
>> Does that make sense to you too? ****
>> ** **
>> Thanks!****
>> ** **
>> Neal Caidin****
>>
>> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator****
>> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org****
>> Skype: nealkdin****
>> AIM: ncaidin at aol.com****
>>
>>
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> samigo-team mailing list
>> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> samigo-team mailing list
>> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-qa/attachments/20130502/aa01764e/attachment.html