[sakai-pmc] Feature for 10.3 ?

[Matthew Jones]

Good catch, SAK-27838 should be reverted until all of the other ones are
added. Looking at the patch it probably wouldn't cause a regression because
isAnon is never set but it's not needed without the others.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
wrote:

> Yes, I definitely had a question about SAK-28044.
>
> SAK-27838 looks like it is already merged into 10.x . Are you saying we
> should revert the patch, or just make sure it goes through a review process
> per "TCC Maintenance Branch Merge Policy")?  That looks like it is related
> to SAK-27824.
>
> Or are these Jiras all related to each other since they are about
> Anonymously grading Assignments? It seems like Western University has done
> a bit of testing, but I'm not clear if they have had these in production
> for a month (I don't think so). And they seem to blur the line between
> maintenance fixes and new feature?
>
> I'm not at all clear on this.
>
> Looking forward to others chiming in (Western U. folks?).
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think the risk to this is that it appears to have caused the (currently
>> fixed) regressions in
>>
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-27824
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-28044
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-27865
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-27838
>>
>> The one on SAK-28044 was a blocker on gradebook that I just found and
>> fixed last week. I think trying to push that for 10.3 (where we want to
>> have a RC in 3 weeks (really just 2 working weeks because of Thanksgiving)
>> might not be enough time to fully test it when it's merged back into 10.x.
>> This could result in having 10.3 pushed back to January.
>>
>> If you think that's worth it or you think we have enough QA that can test
>> through assignment more after the merge I'm for it. Otherwise I'd wait
>> until after this release and target this for 10.4.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [sakai-pmc and sakai-dev]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There is a new feature [1]  that has been completed and tested for
>>> anonymous grading in the Assignment tool.
>>>
>>> Since it is a feature on a maintenance release, do we need to put
>>> forward a lazy consensus proposal to get it merged into 10.x (and therefore
>>> for 10.3)?
>>>
>>> [1] New feature - https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-17606
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neal Caidin
>>> Sakai Community Coordinator
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20141111/53efb504/attachment.html