[sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site

[Steve Swinsburg]

Here is a site that made it into beta with a fairly low number of
questions, users and visits:
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino

You can get a good sense for what the pass mark is from the explanatory
notes on that page.

As John mentioned, one aim is to make these discussions more public to give
us more visibility. I think this gives us a good way to achieve that - the
confluence space wouldn't IMO. However we may indeed have difficulty
getting the required scores just with Sakai. I suggest we continue with
this and see how we go. We may also be able to revisit the idea of an
Apereo space, though would be too broad? I am happy to liaise with the
other projects and see if they are interested, if need be.

cheers,
Steve




On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
wrote:

> Yeah, looking at the entire workflow, I think the bigger problem is the
> commitment phase. To actually get a site through to commitment phase you
> have to have the "minimum" of three scores
>
> - 200 total confirmed committers (up from the 60)
> - 100 of of the committers have to have 200+ rep on Stack Overflow
> - Some formula related to commitment score (
> http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/53650/area-51-commit-percent/53733#53733
> )
>
> Look at a topic like "Latin Language" that is only 50% through commitment
> with 100 committed (
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/48247/latin-language)
>
> Not to be pessimistic but I can't realistically see a Sakai only space
> getting that much activity. I think our only options are
> - The confluence plugin mentioned at the PMC meeting,
> - Suggesting people to post questions to regular Stack OverFlow with Sakai
> Tag and periodically watching the Sakai tag (
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/sakai). Participating with
> voting and answering is good for rep.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> We have 10 example questions so we need another 30 questions and about
>> 380 more votes (at a minimum). I still think the plan should be to get
>> the 40 questions (or maybe 45) in there first and then we will use the
>> dev list to get the votes in there.
>> -AZ
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg
>> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yep I've used up my questions and votes too. Everyone else if you can
>> pose
>> > some questions and vote up the others that would be good.
>> >
>> > sent from my mobile device
>> >
>> > On 07/06/2014 8:10 AM, "Aaron Zeckoski" <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Makes sense. Still worth the discussion but I'm dropping the
>> suggestion.
>> >> I maxed out my questions so we just need a few others to do the same.
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 6, 2014 5:15 PM, "Steve Swinsburg" <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yeah I think we need to keep the projects separate. The other projects
>> >>> may not want to use this anyway.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also these are meant to be 40 example questions which then get voted
>> on
>> >>> to show we have a community. They don't need to be answered afaict. I
>> am
>> >>> unsure if they get transferred to the new community site.
>> >>>
>> >>> JFL we talked about this as an experiment to capture the technical
>> >>> questions that come up on the dev list since the good info can be
>> hard to
>> >>> find unless you remember the thread date/subject etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> If anyone down votes I propose they lose commit rights ;)
>> >>>
>> >>> Back in AU now.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers all.
>> >>> Steve
>> >>>
>> >>> sent from my mobile device
>> >>>
>> >>> On 07/06/2014 6:28 AM, "Charles Severance" <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque
>> >>>> <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Could someone tell me why you want to create such a space wether i's
>> for
>> >>>> Sakai or Apereo?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think that Sakai and CAS should be separate and there probably
>> should
>> >>>> not be an Apereo S.O.  There might be an ApereoOAE stackoverflow.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The foundation is a structure for intellectual property and shared
>> >>>> services - it is not the uber brand above each project.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> /Chuck
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> >>>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> >>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> >>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> >>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20140609/b179e355/attachment.html