[sakai-pmc] [Building Sakai] Lazy consensus proposal to branch Sakai 10

[Matthew Buckett]

On 7 February 2014 17:16, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com> wrote:

> Well for the backport-utils, we should just need to add an exclusion to
> the ical4j dependency, as that's not needed on java 5+ as has been stated.
>
> <exclusion>
>   <artifactId>backport-util-concurrent</artifactId>
>   <groupId>backport-util-concurrent</groupId>
> </exclusion>
>

I think ical4j binds directly against backport-util-concurrent as you can
see when they switched to using the JDK 5 ones directly:

https://github.com/ical4j/ical4j/commit/9f2ed5ba1dac64b3d86a9eef40f8e7af4056f42a

-- 
  Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer, IT Services, University of Oxford
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20140207/025f5720/attachment.html