[sakai-pmc] Published Sakai Upgrade Survey results 2014

[Anthony Whyte]

Q1.  Yes, unless anonymity was a promised feature of the survey, I see no
reason why survey participants should not be listed.  We are an open
community after all.
Q2.  No harm in it.  I would like to see the survey augmented with a
question aimed at getting a sense of the range of external capabilities
that schools are leveraging via BasicLTI.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:

> Hi PMC,
>
> I've published the Sakai Upgrade Survey results [1].  I'll announce to
> the community early next week.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Should I list the institutions which participated in the survey, as
> part of the summary?
>
> 2) Should we put out the Tools survey again, with survey component and
> SQL component, like we did last year? [2] ?
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/PMC/Sakai+upgrade+survey+results+-+Q1+2014
>
> [2]
>
> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Sakai+Tool+Survey+Results+Q2+2013
>
>
> --
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai Community Coordinator
> Apereo Foundation
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype me! (but let me know in advance for the first interaction) - nealkdin
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20140404/922128db/attachment.html