[sakai-pmc] Meta-thoughts about Proposals

[Sam Ottenhoff]

Sakai-dev is wide open, has been our most active list for a decade, and is
where dev changes have traditionally been discussed.  If you want to
encourage people that are not members of sakai-dev to get involved, by all
means, do it.  But I don't see how requiring cross-posting will achieve
improved transparency.  I would instead suggest that you post to these
various lists that being a member of sakai-dev is encouraged if people want
to stay up to date on Sakai development and changes. If someone is only
subscribed to the pedagogy list but really wanted to know about upcoming
dev, then they are lost and need your help.

--Sam


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:

> Hi PMC,
>
> There have been two important proposals in the last week. I think the
> selection of which lists to which to post in both cases is reasonable, to
> hit the intended audiences most likely to want a say and provide valuable
> input to the process.
>
> However, I believe we should be even more transparent and essentially
> notify just about everybody (except probably for the Announcements list).
> For these two proposals: Sakai 10 and Sakai online help, I just sent links
> to the archive discussions to several more lists to inform them.
>
> Does anyone agree with me on the transparency concept? I wonder what the
> best way to achieve this would be?
>
> Best,
> Neal
>
>
>
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> Twitter: ncaidin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20131106/7b561740/attachment.html