[Building Sakai] Rutgers is now using innodb-plugin in production

Robert Cohen robert.cohen at anu.edu.au
Mon Dec 19 15:46:05 PST 2011


Did you evaluate mysql 5.5?
>From what I've read its supposed to have performance improvements over 5.1
even with the innodb plugin.



On 20/12/11 5:54 AM, "Charles Hedrick" <hedrick at rutgers.edu> wrote:

>We've had two episodes of the database server going to 100%. Because some
>of my tests have shown that innodb-plugin works better under some kinds
>of load, we're moving to it. We also had a DNS problem that might have
>contributed to this. It's been fixed, so if our problems don't come back
>we may not be sure what caused it.
>
>We're using old versions of mysql 5.1, simply because we haven't wanted
>to upgrade in the middle of the year, 5.1.44 with innodb plugin 1.0.6.
>We'll probably be moving from our Solaris-based server to a server on
>Linux running the newest 5.1, in late January. It's the final part of our
>new Xenserver / iSCSI virtual architecture. After looking at various test
>results I've decided to run the new system with hypertheading on. Innodb
>plugin should deal with the multicore scaling problems sufficiently for
>that to make sense.
>
>_______________________________________________
>sakai-dev mailing list
>sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
>sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
>"unsubscribe"




More information about the sakai-dev mailing list